Written Communication Jul 2006

Commenting on Writing: Typology and Perceived Helpfulness of Comments from Novice Peer Reviewers and Subject Matter Experts

Kwangsu Cho University of Pittsburgh ; Christian D. Schunn University of Pittsburgh ; Davida Charney The University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

How do comments on student writing from peers compare to those from subject-matter experts? This study examined the types of comments that reviewers produce as well as their perceived helpfulness. Comments on classmates’ papers were collected from two undergraduate and one graduate-level psychology course. The undergraduate papers in one of the courses were also commented on by an independent psychology instructor experienced in providing feedback to students on similar writing tasks. The comments produced by students at both levels were shorter than the instructor’s. The instructor’s comments were predominantly directive and rarely summative. The undergraduate peers’ comments were more mixed in type; directive and praise comments were the most frequent. Consistently, undergraduate peers found directive and praise comments helpful. The helpfulness of the directive comments was also endorsed by a writing expert.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2006-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088306289261
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (23)

  1. Li (2025)
    Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Interaction: Improvin…
    Written Communication
  2. Yallop et al. (2025)
    Cover Letters as a Tool to Elicit Peer Feedback Within Doctoral Writing Groups
    Journal of Writing Analytics
  3. Finkenstaedt-Quinn et al. (2024)
    Student Experiences With Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Che…
    Written Communication
  4. Mitchum et al. (2024)
    How Do We Know It Works? Feedback Loops to Raise the Messy Middle in Online For…
    College Composition and Communication
  5. Lu et al. (2023)
    The relationship between peer feedback features and revision sources mediated b…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 23 →
  1. Rønneberg et al. (2022)
    Teachers’ talk about giving feedback to young text writers, and about giving fe…
    Writing and Pedagogy
  2. Nedzesky et al. (2022)
    Analysis of Peer Review in a Student-Run Scientific Journal
    Double Helix
  3. Lam (2021)
    A web-based feedback platform for peer and teacher feedback on writing: An Acti…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Baker et al. (2021)
    Feature: Transforming the Feedback Paradigm: A Qualitative Study Examining a St…
    Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  5. Neumann et al. (2019)
    Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing
    Computers and Composition
  6. Donahue et al. (2019)
    Peer Review in Biology: Of Novices, Experts, and Disciplines
    Journal of Writing Analytics
  7. Tang et al. (2018)
    Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective …
    Assessing Writing
  8. Lang (2018)
    Evolution of Instructor Response? Analysis of Five Years of Feedback to Students
    Journal of Writing Analytics
  9. Pritchard et al. (2017)
    Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Review of Writing
    Computers and Composition
  10. Anson et al. (2017)
    Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an ex…
    Assessing Writing
  11. Leijen (2017)
    A Novel Approach to Examine the Impact of Web-based Peer Review on the Revision…
    Computers and Composition
  12. Schreibersdorf (2014)
    Literary Discipline in the Margins
    Pedagogy
  13. Wang (2014)
    Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A long…
    Assessing Writing
  14. Szymanski (2014)
    Instructor Feedback in Upper-Division Biology Courses: Moving from Spelling and…
    Across the Disciplines
  15. Wingard et al. (2014)
    Effective Comments and Revisions in Student Writing from WAC Courses
    Across the Disciplines
  16. Rendahl et al. (2013)
    Toward a Complexity of Online Learning: Learners in Online First-Year Writing
    Computers and Composition
  17. Still et al. (2010)
    Listening to Students: A Usability Evaluation of Instructor Commentary
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  18. Carlson et al. (2008)
    Using Computer-Mediated Peer Review in an Engineering Design Course
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (41) · 5 in this index

  1. Applebee, A. N. (1981)
    A study of writing in the secondary school
  2. Artemeva, N. (2002)
    10.37514/LLD-J.2003.6.1.04
    Language and Learning across the Disciplines  ↗
  3. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00202.x
     ↗
  4. Beason (1993)
    Feedback and Revision in Writing across the Curriculum Classes
    Research in the Teaching of English
  5. 10.1080/0260293990240405
     ↗
Show all 41 →
  1. 10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474
     ↗
  2. Cho, K.
    Proceedings of ED-Media 2003
  3. Cho, K.
    Computers & Education
  4. Cho, K. & Schunn, C. (2005). The SWoRD system (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburg, PA: Learning Rese…
  5. Clare, L. C. (2000)
    Learning to write in urban elementary and middle schools: An investigation of teachers’ w…
  6. 10.3102/00028312026002143
     ↗
  7. 10.1080/0268051860010105
     ↗
  8. Coupe, N. (1986)
    Reading children’s writing: A linguistic view
  9. Dragga, S. (1992)
    The technical writing repertoire
  10. 10.2307/358238
     ↗
  11. 10.2307/359079
     ↗
  12. Freedman, S. W. (1987)
    Peer response groups in two ninth-grade classrooms
  13. Graner, M. H. (1985). Revision techniques: Peer editing and the revision workshop. Diss…
  14. Gee (1972)
    Students’ Responses to Teacher Comments
    Research in the Teaching of English
  15. Haswell (2005)
    NCTE/CCCC’s Recent War on Scholarship
    Written Communication
  16. 10.1080/03075079312331382281
     ↗
  17. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.305
     ↗
  18. Leki, I. (1995)
    Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy
  19. 10.1080/03075070120076264
     ↗
  20. Mittan, R. (1989)
    Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students
  21. 10.1080/1355800950320404
     ↗
  22. Neuwirth, C. M.
    Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction ‘94 Conference, April 24-28, 1994, Boston M…
  23. Richer, D. L. (1992)
    Dissertation Abstracts International
  24. Rucker, M. L. (2003)
    College Student Journal
  25. Seidman, E. (1968). Marking students’ compositions: Implications of achievement motivation theory. …
  26. 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.549
     ↗
  27. Smith (2003)
    The Role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing Teachers’ Evaluation…
    Written Communication
  28. 10.2307/358669
     ↗
  29. 10.1080/0260293042000197609
     ↗
  30. 10.2307/356588
     ↗
  31. 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
     ↗
  32. Stevens, A. E. (1973). The effects of positive and negative evaluation on the written composition of low perf…
  33. Straub (1997)
    Students’ Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study
    Research in the Teaching of English
  34. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00171.x
     ↗
  35. 10.1080/00220671.1966.10883440
     ↗
  36. 10.3102/00346543068003249
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 145 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Assessing Writing Jul 2026
    GPTZero and the challenges of AI detection in assessing writing ↗
    Louie Giray; Kershnee Sevnarayan; Kgabo Bridget Maphoto
    assessment artificial intelligence multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Apr 2026
    Embodied Response to LLM Writing ↗
    Lillian Campbell; Jenna Green
    artificial intelligence editorial matter
  3. College Composition and Communication Sep 2025
    Editors’ Introduction: A Dappled, Undisciplined Response to Generative AI ↗
    Matthew Davis; Kara Taczak
    artificial intelligence editorial matter
  4. College Composition and Communication Sep 2025
    Symposium: On Generative AI ↗
    artificial intelligence editorial matter
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jun 2025
    A Decade of Business and Professional Communication Quarterly : A PRISMA Guided Systematic Review ↗
    Daneshwar Sharma; Himanshi Pandey; Vinay Khandelwal; Robyn C. Walker
    assessment professional writing online writing instruction book reviews editorial matter