Analysis of Peer Review in a Student-Run Scientific Journal

Justin Nedzesky Duquesne University ; Meredith Bennett Duquesne University ; Kristin Klucevsekh Duquesne University

Abstract

This tenth-anniversary volume is an occasion to read A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing reflexively, by turning its focus on critical thinking and writing back on itself as an academic genre that organizes knowledge according to time.A journal assumes time to be a linear, unidirectional movement segmented into a past, which has already happened; a present, which is happening; and a future, which has yet to happen.This sequence is inscribed in a journal's paratextuality, such as a chronological division into annual volumes, which conforms reading to knowledge configured temporally: a reference to a text locates that text in the past; an argument against locates a text in the present; and questions for further research locate a text in the future.This commonplace notion of time informs a process of inquiry understandable across the disciplines, but it is also at odds with disciplinary theories of temporality.Consider, for a moment, how the visual arts can realign perception with uncommon patterns of time.When this volume's cover image is viewed according to its title, Counter-Curve (see Figure 1), it creates a curvilinear motion that either quickens along contracting concentric circles or slows along expanding concentric circles.Each motion, as a counter-curve, implies the other, inverse motion, but the either/or structure of perception limits our awareness of time's bidirectionality, described by the image's artist, Dana Karwas (n.d.), as "a single moment curving infinitely around on itself" (para.10).As a moment, time is undivided into past, present, and future.It is instead composed of recurrences that simultaneously spiral inwardly toward an infinitesimal center of nonrecurrence, a point of origin, and outwardly toward an infinite circumference that is the end of time.Because our perception can align with time's contraction or expansion, but not both at once, Counter-Curve can perhaps explain an otherwise paradoxical experience of the moment as ephemeral and durable.If the last ten years of Double Helix is telescoped to this swirl of time, then the practice of reading the journal changes.It locates one in the moment, a condition of "mindfulness" that Ellen Carillo (2016) has advocated for reading, in which one sustains attention to the text, undistracted by the past or the future, because, in this case, neither the past nor the future exists.A sequence of texts is thereby converted into an intertext, and a reference to, an argument against, and questions for further research become recurring features of intertextuality that advance an area of knowledge toward pure originality and the completion of knowledge as ideal and inverse limits of inquiry (see Figure 2).

Journal
Double Helix
Published
2022-01-01
DOI
10.37514/dbh-j.2022.10.1.04
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (51) · 11 in this index

  1. Ahmed, R. (2020). Peer review in academic writing: Different perspectives from instructors and students. TESO…
     ↗
  2. Assessing Writing
  3. Written Communication
  4. Cho, Y., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629-643. …
     ↗
  5. Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process of science: Faculty perc…
     ↗
Show all 51 →
  1. Colthorpe, K., Chen, X., & Zimbardi, K. (2014). Peer feedback enhances a "journal club" for undergraduate sci…
     ↗
  2. Deonandan, R., Patel, P., & Winterbottom, R. (2012). A student-run peer-reviewed journal: an educational tool…
     ↗
  3. Dinitz, S., & Kiedaisch, J. (2009). Tutoring writing as career development. The Writing Lab Newsletter, 34(3), 1.
  4. Journal of Writing Analytics
  5. Dowd, J. E., Thompson, R. J., Jr., Schiff, L. A., & Reynolds, J. A. (2018). Understanding the complex relatio…
     ↗
  6. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing…
     ↗
  7. Written Communication
  8. Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Snyder-White, E., Connor, M., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2019). Characterizing …
     ↗
  9. Gaynor, J. W. (2020). Peer review in the classroom: Student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role o…
     ↗
  10. Gilbert, S. F. (2004). Points of view: Should students be encouraged to publish their research in student-run…
     ↗
  11. Gonyo, C. P., & Cantwell, B. (2015). Faculty perceptions of students in life and physical science research la…
     ↗
  12. Gunersel, A. B., Simpson, N. J., Aufderheide, K. J., & Wang, L. (2008). Effectiveness of Calibrated Peer Revi…
  13. Written Communication
  14. Hunter, A. -B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate researc…
     ↗
  15. Written Communication
  16. Jones, L. S., Allen, L., Cronise, K., Juneja, N., Kohn, R., McClellan, K., Miller, A., Nazir, A., Patel, A., …
  17. Jungck, J. R., Harris, M., Mercuri, R., & Tusin, J. (2004). Points of view: Should students be encouraged to …
     ↗
  18. Kanel, S. (2008). Undergraduate student research journals: Opportunities to publish and learn. Science, 31(3)…
  19. Kaufman, J., & Schunn, C. (2011). Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and i…
     ↗
  20. Klucevsek, K. M. (2016). Transferring skills from classroom to professional writing: Student-faculty peer rev…
     ↗
  21. Across the Disciplines
  22. Mariani, M., Buckley, F., Reidy, T., & Witmer, R. (2013). Promoting student learning and scholarship through …
     ↗
  23. Mcdowell, G. S., Knutsen, J. D., Graham, J. M., Oelker, S. K., & Lijek, R. S. (2019). Co- reviewing and ghost…
     ↗
  24. Mulder, R., Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Pearce, J. (2013). How does student peer review influence perceptions, en…
     ↗
  25. Navalta, J. W., & Lyons, T. S. (2010). Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringen…
     ↗
  26. Ng, K., Lari, M. H. A., Chan, S. W. S., Arora, R. K., Qaiser, F., Sharlandjieva, V., & Noukhovich, S. (2017).…
  27. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer revie…
     ↗
  28. Journal of Writing Research
  29. Pearce, J., Mulder, R., & Baik, C. (2009). Involving students in peer review. Centre for the Study of Higher …
  30. Quitadamo, I. J., & Kurtz, M. J. (2007). Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking per…
     ↗
  31. The WAC Journal
  32. Siegel, V. (2004). Weighing the pros and cons of undergraduateonly journal publications. Cell Biol Ed, 3, 26-27.
     ↗
  33. Spronken-Smith, R. A., Brodeur, J. J., Kajaks, T., Luck, M., Myatt, P., Verburgh, A., Walkington, H., & Wueth…
     ↗
  34. Stephenson, N. S., & Sadler-Mcknight, N. P. (2016). Developing critical thinking skills using the Science Wri…
     ↗
  35. Stone, G., Jensen, K., & Beech, M. (2016). Publishing undergraduate research: Linking teaching and research t…
     ↗
  36. Sun, E., Huggins, J. A., Brown, K. L., Boutin, R. C., Ramey, W. D., Graves, M. L., & Oliver, D. C. (2020). De…
     ↗
  37. Tatalovic, M. (2008). Student science publishing: an exploratory study of undergraduate science research jour…
  38. Timmerman, B., & Strickland, D. (2009). Faculty should consider peer review as a means of improving students'…
  39. Trautmann, N. M. (2009). Designing Peer Review for Pedagogical Success. Journal of College Science Teaching, …
  40. Across the Disciplines
  41. Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? Asses…
     ↗
  42. Walkington, H. (2012). Developing dialogic learning space: The case of online undergraduate research journals…
     ↗
  43. Ware, M. E., & Burns, S. R. (2008). Undergraduate student research journals: Opportunities for and benefits f…
  44. Weaver, K. F., Morales, V., Nelson, M., Weaver, P. F., Toledo, A., & Godde, K. (2016). The benefits of peer r…
     ↗
  45. Weiner, S. A., & Watkinson, C. (2014). What do students learn from participation in an undergraduate research…
     ↗
  46. Journal of Writing Research