Most cited in this index

What does the field treat as foundational, and is that different from the received account? These rankings count citations within the discipline's own journals, not Google Scholar's cross-disciplinary totals, so an article cited 200 times in CCC, College English, and Written Communication ranks high here while one cited 200 times in linguistics or education journals does not. The list is therefore a reasonable approximation of what rhetoric and composition treats as essential reading.

Methodology

Data source

Citation data is derived from reference lists deposited by publishers with CrossRef. Pinakes retrieves the full reference list for each article that has one available, then matches referenced DOIs against DOIs in the article index. When article A’s reference list contains article B’s DOI, that constitutes one internal citation of B by A. Only citations between articles both present in this index are counted.

Counting method

The “Most Cited” count for each article is the number of distinct indexed articles that cite it: a simple count of incoming edges in the citation network. Self-citations are included when they appear in the deposited reference list. Duplicate citations (the same article referencing the same target multiple times) are counted once.

View modes

All: A single ranked list of the most-cited articles across the full index. By Journal: Articles grouped by the journal they were published in, showing the most-cited articles within each venue. By Topic: Articles grouped by their topic tags, showing the most-cited articles for each research area. By Decade: Articles grouped by publication decade, showing the most-cited articles from each decade.

Filters

The journal filter restricts which cited articles are displayed (not which citing articles contribute to the count). The topic filter restricts to articles carrying a particular tag. Year range filters restrict by publication year of the cited article. All filters interact additively.

Limitations

These are internal citation counts only. An article with 5 citations here may have 500 in Google Scholar; its ranking here reflects its influence within the rhetoric and composition journals indexed by Pinakes specifically. Not all journals deposit reference lists with CrossRef: those that do not can be cited but cannot contribute citations. Older articles have had more time to accumulate citations, giving them a structural advantage over recent work. See the coverage panel below for per-journal reference deposit rates.

Full citation data available
JournalArticlesWith referencesCoverage
Across the Disciplines370370100.0%
Advances in the History of Rhetoric312312100.0%
Argumentation14131413100.0%
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly531531100.0%
College Composition and Communication69376937100.0%
College English1068310683100.0%
Communication Design Quarterly414414100.0%
Communication Design Quarterly Review6565100.0%
Community Literacy Journal465465100.0%
Computers and Composition16801680100.0%
Double Helix112112100.0%
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication32633263100.0%
Journal of Academic Writing245245100.0%
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication15451545100.0%
Journal of Writing Analytics9595100.0%
Journal of Writing Research301301100.0%
Open Words: Access and English Studies135135100.0%
Pedagogy11511151100.0%
Philosophy & Rhetoric697697100.0%
Poroi260260100.0%
Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments134134100.0%
Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric604604100.0%
Res Rhetorica319319100.0%
Research in the Teaching of English16861686100.0%
Rhetoric & Public Affairs733733100.0%
Rhetoric Review14021402100.0%
Rhetoric Society Quarterly17821782100.0%
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine202202100.0%
Rhetorica20692069100.0%
Teaching English in the Two-Year College15231523100.0%
Technical Communication Quarterly11261126100.0%
The WAC Journal336336100.0%
Writing and Pedagogy345345100.0%
Written Communication917917100.0%
Journal of Business and Technical Communication1061106099.9%
Assessing Writing1070106899.8%
Writing Center Journal91488997.3%
Composition Forum56251491.5%
Literacy in Composition Studies19116385.3%
Limited or no citation data
JournalArticlesWith referencesCoverage
Peitho42712328.8%
No DOIs (web-only journals)
JournalArticlesWith referencesCoverage
Basic Writing e-Journal1080—
Composition Studies3550—
Computers and Composition Digital Press3070—
Enculturation4990—
JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture, and Politics11800—
Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics550—
Journal of Response to Writing1370—
KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society3390—
Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy9140—
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal2450—
Pre/Text2310—
Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society2410—
The Peer Review2370—
WPA: Writing Program Administration9820—
Writing Lab Newsletter3540—

Citation data comes from CrossRef, which aggregates reference lists deposited by publishers. Some publishers in the index (particularly SAGE and Taylor & Francis) deposit complete reference lists for their journals. Others, including some open-access and society-published journals, deposit DOIs but not reference lists. Web-only journals without DOIs cannot contribute citation data at all, though they can still appear as cited works when other journals reference them. The citation network and 'Most Cited' rankings therefore reflect a partial picture, weighted toward journals whose publishers participate fully in CrossRef's reference deposit system. This is a limitation of the available infrastructure, not a judgment about the value of any journal's scholarship.

Journal: Topic: Years: –
2020s
  1. 1
    2020 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 56
  2. 2
    2022 Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Cited by 42
  3. 3
    2021 Literacy in Composition Studies Cited by 33
  4. 4
    2020 Written Communication Cited by 30
  5. 5
    2023 Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Cited by 29
  6. 6
    2020 Journal of Writing Research Cited by 29
  7. 7
2010s
  1. 1
    2016 Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Cited by 166
  2. 2
    2016 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 158
  3. 3
    2012 Journal of Business and Technical Communication Cited by 130
  4. 4
  5. 5
    2014 Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Cited by 79
  6. 6
    2011 College English Cited by 79
  7. 7
    2013 Literacy in Composition Studies Cited by 64
  8. 8
    2018 Literacy in Composition Studies Cited by 59
  9. 9
    2019 Literacy in Composition Studies Cited by 58
  10. 10
    2013 Literacy in Composition Studies Cited by 58
2000s
  1. 1
    2005 Rhetoric Society Quarterly Cited by 144
  2. 2
    2009 Journal of Business and Technical Communication Cited by 84
  3. 3
    2002 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 77
  4. 4
  5. 5
    2006 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 66
  6. 6
    2007 College Composition and Communication Cited by 64
  7. 7
    2007 College Composition and Communication Cited by 63
  8. 8
    2005 Written Communication Cited by 61
  9. 9
    2007 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 56
  10. 10
    2006 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 54
1990s
  1. 1
    1997 Written Communication Cited by 146
  2. 2
    1998 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 92
  3. 3
    1993 Written Communication Cited by 79
  4. 4
    1996 Technical Communication Quarterly Cited by 78
  5. 5
    1993 Journal of Business and Technical Communication Cited by 76
  6. 6
    1992 Written Communication Cited by 61
  7. 7
    1994 Written Communication Cited by 53
  8. 8
  9. 9
    1990 Written Communication Cited by 52
  10. 10
    1996 College Composition and Communication Cited by 47
1980s
  1. 1
    1984 College English Cited by 111
  2. 2
    1981 College Composition and Communication Cited by 107
  3. 3
    1986 Written Communication Cited by 76
  4. 4
    1982 Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Cited by 57
  5. 5
    1987 Research in the Teaching of English Cited by 53
  6. 6
    1985 Research in the Teaching of English Cited by 51
  7. 7
    1986 Written Communication Cited by 50
  8. 8
    1984 Written Communication Cited by 47
  9. 9
    1986 Rhetoric Review Cited by 42
  10. 10
    1985 Written Communication Cited by 42
1970s
  1. 1
    1979 Research in the Teaching of English Cited by 47
  2. 2
    1977 College Composition and Communication Cited by 41
  3. 3
    1975 Research in the Teaching of English Cited by 32