This study investigates developmental changes in grammatical subjects in the English writing of Japanese learners, focusing on subject position as an index of syntactic growth. Previous L2 assessment research has emphasized clausal subordination and global complexity indices; noun phrase complexity has attracted growing attention, but the subject position itself has rarely been isolated as a unit of analysis. Drawing on a longitudinal corpus of 26,399 texts written by 1,086 Japanese high school students over three years, subjects were automatically extracted and annotated using SubjEx, a dependency-parsing system developed for this purpose (accuracy: 93.5%). Mean subject length increased steadily across grades and CEFR proficiency bands, with clearer differentiation from B1 onward; a mixed-effects model with a random slope further indicates increasing divergence in learners’ growth trajectories. Subjects shifted from pronoun-dominant forms toward more complex noun phrases, with greater use of adjectival modification, possessives, compound nouns, and prepositional phrases, while lexical analyses showed a decline in first-person subjects and a rise in informationally dense nominal patterns. Subject position thus emerges as a sensitive indicator of L2 writing development, reflecting a shift from personal expression toward condensed informational packaging, with implications for complexity research and proficiency assessment.

Discussions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) focus on describing AI as either a tool or a collaborator. Such discussions do not fully grasp GenAI's transformative impact. This article proposes a model of cyborg learning that outlines the skills necessary for using GenAI effectively: background knowledge, critical evaluation of AI output, and rhetorical integration of AI output. Presenting multiple use cases from the literature in technical and professional communication and the author's own experience, the article illustrates how to write as a cyborg.

This article revisits Richard Weaver’s concept of spaciousness as a rhetorical effect and repositions it within contemporary visual rhetoric, particularly data visualizations. Although Weaver’s account of spaciousness is rooted in a political ideology that presumes shared cultural values, the concept offers a useful lens for understanding how style operates in visual communication. Drawing on the classical Ciceronian styles, this article argues that spaciousness functions as a visual analogue of the grand style, emphasizing abstraction rather than detail. Analyses of sparklines, cartographic maps, network visualizations, and metaphor-based displays show how plain style prioritizes instruction and transparency, grand style cultivates openness and shared meaning, and middle style modulates between visual scales through perceptual or interactive zooming. The article demonstrates how stylistic spaciousness in data visualization reinforces cultural assumptions about connectivity, complexity, and knowledge, offering a rhetorically grounded approach to studying visual style.

In Unorganized Women, Jane Greer compellingly argues that low-wage, white women workers deployed activist, repetitious rhetorical labor at the turn of the nineteenth century to shape public percept...

This article contributes to conversations among feminist rhetoricians about the rhetoricity of work by investigating the affordances of “career” as a chronotope that both disrupts and reinforces sexist and racist hierarchies. A case study, this article focuses on a scrapbook assembled by Helen Jacobson Richardson, one of the first stewardesses hired by Northwest Airlines in 1939. Like most early stewardesses, Richardson’s employment ended when she married in 1942. This essay argues Richardson’s uptake of the career chronotope invested her work life with greater dignity and contravened assumptions about the inconsequential nature of women’s workforce participation in the mid-twentieth century.

This article historicizes the emergence of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as an Islamic counterpublic in the U.S. public sphere prior to 9/11. The study analyzes how CAIR functioned as an Islamic counterpublic to contest entrenched Islamophobic rhetorics that positioned Muslims as collective threats to U.S. public safety. It highlights how CAIR performed counterpublic rhetorical moves by using oppositional interpretations to construct Muslim ethos and moral identities; coalitional rhetoric to highlight Muslims’ civic engagement; and world-making to advance new ways of seeing Muslims. The study provides a critical history to CAIR’s contemporary advocacy, contributing to scholarship on Islamic/Muslim counterpublicity.

This experiment tested the impacts of demographic congruence between synthetic humanlike spokesperson avatars and learners. Among 437 U.S. working adults, congruence did not affect knowledge transfer, and effects on perceived effectiveness and belonging were confined to one subgroup: Heterosexual White men rated incongruent avatars as more effective yet reported lower belonging with avatars of the same race but different gender. No other subgroup showed significant effects. Behavioral avatar choices mirrored this pattern. These findings identify a precise intersectional boundary condition, suggesting that effectiveness ratings alone may mask inclusion gaps. Implications for corporate training and business communication pedagogy are discussed.