The Challenges and Opportunities of AI-Assisted Writing: Developing AI Literacy for the AI Age

Peter Cardon ; Carolin Fleischmann Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences ; Jolanta Aritz University of Southern California ; Minna Logemann Baruch College ; Jeanette Heidewald Indiana University

Abstract

Generative AI may significantly disrupt the teaching and practice of business communication. This study of 343 communication instructors revealed a collective view that AI-assisted writing will be widely adopted in the workplace and will require significant changes to instruction. Key perceived challenges include less critical thinking and authenticity in writing. Key perceived benefits include more efficiency and better idea generation in writing. Students will need to develop AI literacy—composed of application, authenticity, accountability, and agency—to succeed in the workplace. Recommendations are provided for instructors and administrators to ensure the benefits of AI-assisted writing can outweigh the challenges.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2023-09-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906231176517
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (29)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 29 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Across the Disciplines
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. College Composition and Communication
  7. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  8. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  9. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  10. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  15. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  16. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  17. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  18. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  19. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  20. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  21. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  22. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  23. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  24. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

References (60) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.2139/ssrn.4345921
     ↗
  2. Babic D., Chen D., Evgeniou T., Fayard A. (2020, July-August). A better way to onboard AI: Use it as a tool t…
  3. Bang Y., Cahyawijaya S., Lee N., Dai W., Su D., Wilie B., Lovenia H., Ji Z., Yu T., Chung W., Do Q. V., Yan X…
  4. 10.1148/radiol.223312
     ↗
  5. 10.1177/23294884221126489
     ↗
Show all 60 →
  1. Bush D. (2023a, February). After 20 hours with ChatGPT, I found these 7 “goals” to be the best instructions w…
  2. Bush D. (2023b, February). Refresh your perspective by asking ChatGPT to rewrite your writing using these 6 “…
  3. 10.31235/osf.io/b3ezy
     ↗
  4. 10.1177/23294884211037009
     ↗
  5. Chow A. R. (2023, February 8). How ChatGPT managed to grow faster than TikTok or Instagram. Time. https://tim…
  6. Chui M., Roberts R., Yee L. (2022, December 20). Generative AI is here: How tools like ChatGPT could change y…
  7. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  8. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  9. 10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h
     ↗
  10. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
  11. D’Agostino S. (2023, January 12). ChatGPT advice academics can use now. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insideh…
  12. Davenport T. H., Mittal N. (2022). How generative AI is changing creative work. Harvard Business Review. http…
  13. 10.1177/1525822X10388468
     ↗
  14. 10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465
     ↗
  15. 10.1037/xge0000033
     ↗
  16. 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103662
     ↗
  17. 10.2139/ssrn.4358789
     ↗
  18. 10.25300/MISQ/2021/16553
     ↗
  19. 10.1287/isre.2021.1079
     ↗
  20. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  21. 10.1101/2022.12.23.22283901
     ↗
  22. 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107592
     ↗
  23. Guo B., Zhang X., Wang Z., Jiang M., Nie J., Ding Y., Yue J., Wu Y. (2023). How close is ChatGPT to human exp…
  24. 10.2139/ssrn.4316084
     ↗
  25. Jin B. (2023, April 14). Elon Musk creates new artificial intelligence company X.AI. The Wall Street Journal.…
  26. 10.1093/jcmc/zmac014
     ↗
  27. Kissinger H., Schmidt E., Huttenlocher D. (2023, February 24). ChatGPT heralds an intellectual revolution. Th…
  28. Leswing K. (2023, February 24). Mark Zuckerberg announces Meta’s new large language model as A.I. race heats …
  29. 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5
     ↗
  30. Lowrey A. (2023, January 20). How ChatGPT will destabilize white-collar work. The Atlantic. https://www.theat…
  31. 10.1080/1062726X.2022.2068553
     ↗
  32. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation
  33. Mollick E. (2022, December 14). ChatGPT is a tipping point for AI. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2…
  34. Mollick E. (2023, February 15). I hope you weren’t getting too comfortable. One Useful Thing. https://oneusef…
  35. Nerozzi T. (2023, February 10). Bill Gates says ChatGPT will “change the world,” make jobs more efficient. Fo…
  36. 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
     ↗
  37. 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3
     ↗
  38. 10.1002/cc.193
     ↗
  39. Pichai S. (2023, February 6). An important next step on our AI journey. https://blog.google/technology/ai/bar…
  40. 10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1
     ↗
  41. 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
     ↗
  42. Schechner S. (2023, January 17). Microsoft plans to build OpenAI, ChatGPT features into all products. The Wal…
  43. Siddike M. A. K., Spohrer J., Demirkan H., Kohda Y. (2018). People’s interactions with cognitive assistants f…
     ↗
  44. Sterling T. (2023, April 13). European privacy watchdog creates ChatGPT task force. Reuters. https://www.reut…
  45. Susnjak T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
  46. 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075
     ↗
  47. Terwiesch C. (2023). Would ChatGPT get a Wharton MBA? A prediction based on its performance in the operations…
  48. 10.1126/science.adg7879
     ↗
  49. Technical Communication
  50. 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
     ↗
  51. 10.2307/30036540
     ↗
  52. 10.2307/41410412
     ↗
  53. Wertz J. (2023, March 2). ChatGPT: Thinking outside the content marketing box. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com…
  54. Williams T. (2023, February 25). Some companies are already replacing workers with ChatGPT, despite warnings …
  55. 10.1613/jair.1.11345
     ↗