Research in the Teaching of English Feb 1997

Students’ Reactions to Teacher Comments: An Exploratory Study

Richard Straub

Abstract

Current scholarship indicates that most writing students read and make use of teachers’ written comments on their drafts and find some types of comments more helpful than others. But the research is unclear about which comments students find most useful and why. This article presents the results of a survey of 142 first- year college writing students’ perceptions about teacher comments on a writing sample. A 40-item questionnaire was used to investigate students’ reactions to three variables of teacher response: focus, specificity, and mode. The survey found that these college students seemed equally interested in getting responses on global matters of content, purpose, and organization as on local matters of sentence structure, wording, and correctness, but were wary of negative comments about ideas they had already expressed in their text. It also found that these students favored detailed commentary with specific and elaborated comments, but they did not like comments that sought to control their writing or that failed to provide helpful criticism for improving the writing. They most preferred comments that provided employed open questions, or included explanations that guided revision.

Journal
Research in the Teaching of English
Published
1997-02-01
DOI
10.58680/rte19973873
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (17)

  1. Pearson (2022)
    The mediating effects of student beliefs on engagement with written feedback in…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Denny (2021)
    A genre and discourse-based examination of audio commentary
    Writing and Pedagogy
  3. Kramer-Simpson (2018)
    Feedback From Internship Mentors in Technical Communication Internships
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Anson et al. (2017)
    Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an ex…
    Assessing Writing
  5. Schreibersdorf (2014)
    Literary Discipline in the Margins
    Pedagogy
Show all 17 →
  1. Wingard et al. (2014)
    Effective Comments and Revisions in Student Writing from WAC Courses
    Across the Disciplines
  2. DelleBovi (2012)
    Literacy instruction: From assignment to assessment
    Assessing Writing
  3. Silva (2012)
    Camtasia in the Classroom: Student Attitudes and Preferences for Video Commenta…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Cope et al. (2011)
    Technology-Mediated Writing Assessments: Principles and Processes
    Computers and Composition
  5. Taylor (2011)
    “I Really Don't Know What He Meant by That”: How Well Do Engineering Students U…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Still et al. (2010)
    Listening to Students: A Usability Evaluation of Instructor Commentary
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Cho et al. (2006)
    Commenting on Writing: Typology and Perceived Helpfulness of Comments from Novi…
    Written Communication
  8. Peterson et al. (2006)
    Sixth-Grade Teachers’ Written Comments on Student Writing: Genre and Gender Inf…
    Written Communication
  9. Stern et al. (2006)
    Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled
    Assessing Writing
  10. Haswell (2006)
    The Complexities of Responding to Student Writing: or, Looking for Shortcuts vi…
    Across the Disciplines
  11. Batt (2005)
    The Rhetoric of the End Comment
    Rhetoric Review
  12. Lunsford (2002)
    Contextualizing Toulmin's Model in the Writing Classroom: A Case Study
    Written Communication

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 93 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Journal of Response to Writing Jan 2017
    Editorial Introduction ↗
    Gilliland, Betsy; Eckstein, Grant
    first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development revision digital rhetoric grammar and mechanics book reviews editorial matter
  2. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    Feedback Menus: Expanding Student Choice in Response to Writing ↗
    Testa, Andrew
    first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development revision professional writing literacy studies editorial matter
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly Oct 2024
    Editors’ Use of Comprehensive Style Guides: The Case of Singular They ↗
    Jo Mackiewicz; Shaya Kraut; Allison Durazzi
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development writing centers technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter
  4. Pedagogy Oct 2024
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development revision argument collaborative writing assessment writing program administration multimodality multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing disability studies community literacy editorial matter
  5. Pedagogy Apr 2024
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter