College Composition and Communication Feb 1986

Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision

Linda Flower ; John R. Hayes ; Linda Carey ; Karen Schriver ; James Stratman

Abstract

Preview this article: Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/37/1/collegecompositionandcommunication11246-1.gif

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
1986-02-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc198611246
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (14)

  1. Baker et al. (2025)
    Business Communication and Editing Students’ Evaluations of Written Error: An E…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Kramer et al. (2025)
    Writing Circles in STEM: Why structured peer review engages students as writers…
    Across the Disciplines
  3. Gennaro et al. (2024)
    Linguistic Currents in Writing Studies Scholarship: Describing Variation in How…
    Across the Disciplines
  4. Bondar et al. (2023)
    Composition Organization and Development Analysis (CODA) Scale: Equipping high …
    Assessing Writing
  5. Lu et al. (2023)
    The relationship between peer feedback features and revision sources mediated b…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 14 →
  1. Conijn et al. (2022)
    A Product- and Process-Oriented Tagset for Revisions in Writing
    Written Communication
  2. Latif (2021)
    Remodeling writers’ composing processes: Implications for writing assessment
    Assessing Writing
  3. Yu et al. (2021)
    Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework
    Assessing Writing
  4. Wang et al. (2020)
    eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing ev…
    Assessing Writing
  5. Zhang (2020)
    Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Studen…
    Assessing Writing
  6. Yu (2019)
    Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master's…
    Assessing Writing
  7. Chen et al. (2019)
    Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing
    Assessing Writing
  8. Ranalli et al. (2018)
    Exploring the potential of process-tracing technologies to support assessment f…
    Assessing Writing
  9. Gillam (2008)
    Writing in Ecological Microcosms: A Pedagogical Field Map for Re-thinking Process
    Open Words: Access and English Studies

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 726 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Assessing Writing Jul 2026
    Examining linguistic reasoning and metalinguistic strategies in L2 writing: Insights from teacher- and AI-feedback revisions ↗
    Huican Huo; Lawrence Jun Zhang
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy advanced composition teacher development revision argument multilingual writers
  2. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Student perceptions of screen recording and screencast assignments in first-year writing ↗
    Julie Townsend; Melanie Gagich
    first-year composition writing pedagogy revision
  3. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    More Than Treating Errors: Bridging the Gaps and Expanding the Agenda for Scholarship on Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Writers ↗
    Goldstein, Lynn; Kohls, Robert
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development revision multilingual writers
  4. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    Feedback Menus: Expanding Student Choice in Response to Writing ↗
    Testa, Andrew
    first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development revision professional writing literacy studies editorial matter
  5. Pedagogy Apr 2026
    Beyond Auto-Generated Writing ↗
    Jessica Estep
    first-year composition writing pedagogy revision qualitative research