Assessing Writing Jan 2004

A comparison of generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in an analysis of college sophomore writing

Richard R Sudweeks ; Suzanne Reeve Brigham Young University ; William S. Bradshaw Brigham Young University
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2004.11.001
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Poe et al. (2019)
    Evidence of fairness: Twenty-five years of research in Assessing Writing
    Assessing Writing
  2. Zheng et al. (2019)
    What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Wr…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Ohta et al. (2018)
    Integrated writing scores based on holistic and multi-trait scales: A generaliz…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Janssen et al. (2015)
    Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
    Assessing Writing
  5. Gennaro (2013)
    How different are they? A comparison of Generation 1.5 and international L2 lea…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 6 →
  1. Huang (2012)
    Using generalizability theory to examine the accuracy and validity of large-sca…
    Assessing Writing

References (29)

  1. Advanced Placement Program, The College Board. (1996). AP English language and composition. Free-response sco…
  2. Bond (2001)
    Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences
  3. Brennan (2001)
    Generalizability theory
  4. Brennan (2001)
    Manual for urGENOVA
  5. Brennan (1995)
    Generalizability of performance assessments
    Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice  ↗
Show all 29 →
  1. Crick (1983)
    Manual for GENOVA: A generalized analysis of variance system (ACT technical bulletin no. 43)
  2. Crocker (1986)
    Introduction to classical and modern test theory
  3. Cronbach (1972)
    The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles
  4. Ebel (1951)
    Estimation of the reliability of ratings
    Psychometrika  ↗
  5. Embretson (2000)
    Item response theory for psychologists
  6. Engelhard (2002)
    Monitoring raters in performance assessments
    Large-scale assessment programs for all students: Validity, technical adequacy, and implementation
  7. Fisher (1992)
    Reliability statistics
    Rasch Measurement Tranasactions
  8. Hart (1976)
    The need beyond reason
    Brigham Young University Studies
  9. Hoyt (2000)
    Rater bias in psychological research: When is it a problem and what can we do about it?
    Psychological Methods  ↗
  10. Linacre (1989)
    Many-facet Rasch measurement
  11. Linacre (2003)
    A user's guide to FACETS [computer program manual]
  12. Linacre, J. M. (2003b). Minifac [computer program, version 3.48.0]. Chicago: MESA Press.
  13. Lunz, M. E., Stahl, J. A., & Wright B. D. (1996). The invariance of judge severity calibrations. In: G. Engel…
  14. Marcoulides (1996)
    Estimating variance components in generalizability theory: The covariance structure analy…
    Structural Equation Modeling  ↗
  15. McNamara (1996)
    Measuring second language performance
  16. Miller (1978)
    Tragedy and the common man
    The theater essays of Arthur Miller
  17. Myford (2003)
    Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part I
    Journal of Applied Measurement
  18. Myford (2004)
    Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II
    Journal of Applied Measurement
  19. Oosterhoff (1996)
    Developing and using classroom assessments
  20. Rasch (1980)
    Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests
  21. Shavelson (1991)
    Generalizability theory: A primer
  22. Smith (2001)
    Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: A Rasch …
    Journal of Applied Measurement
  23. Wright (1989)
    Observations are always ordinal: Measurement, however, must be interval
    Archives of Physical Measurement and Rehabilitation
  24. Wright (1994)
    Reasonable mean-square fit values
    Rasch Measurement Transactions
CrossRef global citation count: 68 View in citation network → Build reading path →