Double Helix Jan 2014 Open Access

Thinking Critically in Undergraduate Biology: Flipping the Classroom and Problem-Based Learning

Tracie Marcella. Addy ; Catherine LePrevost ; Maura Stevenson Quinnipiac University

Abstract

Over the last seven years, I have spent time across three continents talking to scientists and mathematicians about their beliefs and attitudes and experiences related to writing in their respective disciplines.I have been impressed by the passion and insight with which most have talked about writing and its relationship to critical thinking, and I have often been surprised by how they engage in these practices.For example, rather than working from an a priori hypothesis, many researchers in the STEM disciplines compose backwards, from the results to the introduction.And when reading, many seem to move from the middle of a paper outwards, beginning with the results and method, using an extremely critical eye, and then perhaps scanning out to the introduction and the discussion, or dispensing with these sections altogether.Over and over again, I heard this same story from different scientists, as if it were a secret each alone had stumbled upon.In addition, collaboration, conversation and peer review are very much part of the language of composition that takes place in the sciences (co-authorship, the hierarchies of disciplinary or interdisciplinary teams, the drafting process and the use of technology), but we who work in WID (writing in the disciplines) and WAC (writing across the curriculum) programs are constantly challenged: "How do we teach process in ways that are disciplinarily appropriate?"Historically, we haven't done this well.As Burton and Morgan observed on the training of mathematicians as writers,

Journal
Double Helix
Published
2014-01-01
DOI
10.37514/dbh-j.2014.2.1.09
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. (2019)
    Critical Thinking Futures
    Double Helix
  2. Katz (2018)
    A Praxis of Entry: First-Year Writing as the Critical Thinking Course
    Double Helix

References (26)

  1. Bailey, R. (2009). Undergraduate students' perceptions of the role and utility of written assessment feedback…
     ↗
  2. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R. (2000). Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context. London: R…
  3. Bazerman, C. (1989). Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  4. Bloxham, S. (2009). "Marking and moderation in the UK: false assumptions and wasted resources." Assessment an…
     ↗
  5. Brew, A. (2006). Research and Teaching: Beyond the divide. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
     ↗
Show all 26 →
  1. Chang, H. (2005). "Turning an undergraduate class into a professional research community." Teaching in Higher…
     ↗
  2. Dressen Hammouda, D. (2008). "From novice to disciplinary expert: disciplinary identity and genre mastery." E…
     ↗
  3. Gee, J. (1990). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
  4. Gee, J. (2000). "The New Literacy Studies: from 'socially situated' to the work of the social" in D. Barton, …
  5. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. York: The Higher Education A…
  6. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterd…
     ↗
  7. Jenkins A., Healey M., & Zetter, R. (2007). Linking teaching and research in disciplines and departments. Yor…
  8. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P.A. (2009). "Exploring the scholarship of teaching." Journal of Higher Education, 71.…
     ↗
  9. Lambert, C. (2009). "Pedagogies of participation in higher education: a case for research-based learning." Pe…
     ↗
  10. LaTour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, cited in D. Barton, M.…
  11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge U…
     ↗
  12. McConlogue, T., Mueller, J., & Shelton, J. (2010). "Challenges of developing engineering students' writing th…
  13. McConlogue, T. (2014). "Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback…
     ↗
  14. Nicol, D. (2010). "From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education.…
     ↗
  15. O'Gorman, E.J., Pichler, D.E., Adams, G., Benstead, J.P, Cohen, H., Craig, N., … Woodward, G. (2012). "Impact…
     ↗
  16. Sadler, R.D. (2010). "Beyond Feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal." Assessment and Ev…
     ↗
  17. Shay, S. (2005). "The assessment of complex tasks: a double reading," Studies in Higher Education, 30.6: 663 -679.
     ↗
  18. Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge Universi…
  19. Underwood, A.J. (1997). Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of var…
     ↗
  20. USA Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (1999). Reinventing Undergraduate…
  21. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Pedagogy Oct 2024
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development revision argument collaborative writing assessment writing program administration multimodality multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing disability studies community literacy editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  3. Journal of Writing Research May 2015
    Mediators and Moderators in Individual and Collaborative Writing to Learn ↗
    P.D. Klein
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum argument collaborative writing
  4. Double Helix Jan 2014
    Better Than Business-as-Usual: Improving Scientific Practices During Discourse and Writing by Playing a Collaborative Mystery Game ↗
    Denise Bressler
    discourse analysis writing across the curriculum argument collaborative writing
  5. Double Helix Jan 2014
    Peer Assessment of Writing and Critical Thinking in STEM: Insights into Student and Faculty Perceptions and Practices ↗
    Irene Reed; Steven J. Pearlman; Carol Millard; David Carillo
    writing across the curriculum argument collaborative writing assessment