Double Helix Jan 2014 Open Access

Peer Assessment of Writing and Critical Thinking in STEM: Insights into Student and Faculty Perceptions and Practices

Irene Reed ; Steven J. Pearlman ; Carol Millard ; David Carillo

Abstract

Over the last seven years, I have spent time across three continents talking to scientists and mathematicians about their beliefs and attitudes and experiences related to writing in their respective disciplines.I have been impressed by the passion and insight with which most have talked about writing and its relationship to critical thinking, and I have often been surprised by how they engage in these practices.For example, rather than working from an a priori hypothesis, many researchers in the STEM disciplines compose backwards, from the results to the introduction.And when reading, many seem to move from the middle of a paper outwards, beginning with the results and method, using an extremely critical eye, and then perhaps scanning out to the introduction and the discussion, or dispensing with these sections altogether.Over and over again, I heard this same story from different scientists, as if it were a secret each alone had stumbled upon.In addition, collaboration, conversation and peer review are very much part of the language of composition that takes place in the sciences (co-authorship, the hierarchies of disciplinary or interdisciplinary teams, the drafting process and the use of technology), but we who work in WID (writing in the disciplines) and WAC (writing across the curriculum) programs are constantly challenged: "How do we teach process in ways that are disciplinarily appropriate?"Historically, we haven't done this well.As Burton and Morgan observed on the training of mathematicians as writers,

Journal
Double Helix
Published
2014-01-01
DOI
10.37514/dbh-j.2014.2.1.08
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (29) · 1 in this index

  1. Addy, T.M., & Stevenson, M.O. (2014). Evaluating Biological Claims to Enhance Critical Thinking through Posit…
     ↗
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biolog…
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: …
  4. American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). (2013). VALUE: Valid assessment of learning in und…
  5. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich P.R., ... Wittrock, …
Show all 29 →
  1. Arum, R., Cho, E., Kim, J., & Roska, J. (2012). Documenting uncertain times: Post-graduate transitions of the…
  2. Arum, R., & Roska, J. (2011). Academically adrift: limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: Chicago…
     ↗
  3. Barrows, H.S., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York, NY: …
  4. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washingto…
  5. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D.YP. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. B…
     ↗
  6. Bishop, J.L., & Verleger, M.A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom a Survey of Research. 120% ASEE Annual Conferenc…
     ↗
  7. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: Davi…
  8. Carter et al. (2007)
    Writing to Learn by Learning to Write in the Disciplines
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. College Board. (2013). AP Central. The Biology Exam http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/exam/examin…
  10. Murphy, D., & Dodd, B. A. Comparison of College Performance of Matched AP and non-AP Student Groups. Research…
  11. Ennis, R.H. (1991). Critical Thinking a Streamlined Conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5 -24.
     ↗
  12. Ennis, R.H. (1996). Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
  13. Ennis, R.H, Millman, J.. & Tomko, T.N. (2005). Administration Manual: Cornell Critical Thinking Tests. 5" Edi…
  14. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, S., DeHaan, R., ... Wood, W.B. (2004). Scienti…
     ↗
  15. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C.M. (2006). Scientific Teaching. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman. Hoskinson,…
     ↗
  16. Lawson, A. (2001). Promoting Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in College Biology. Bioscience, 27(1), 13 -24.
  17. Luft, J.A., & Roehrig, G.H. (2007). Capturing Science Teachers' Epistemological Beliefs: The Development of t…
  18. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Scie…
  19. Partnership in Undergraduate Life Sciences Education (PULSE) (2013). Pulse Community. http://www.pulsecommuni…
  20. Quitadamo, I. J., & Kurtz, M. (2007). Learning to improve: Using writing to increase critical thinking perfor…
     ↗
  21. Rutledge, M. L. (2005). Making the nature of science relevant: Effectiveness of an activity that stresses cri…
     ↗
  22. Tagg, J. (2003). The Learning Paradigm College. Boston, MA: Anker Publishing Co.
  23. Tyser, R.W., & Cerbin, W.J. (1991). Critical thinking exercises for introductory biology courses. Bioscience,…
     ↗
  24. Wolniak, G.C., & Engberg, M.E. (2010). Academic achievement in the first year of college: Evidence of the per…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Pedagogy Oct 2024
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development revision argument collaborative writing assessment writing program administration multimodality multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing disability studies community literacy editorial matter
  2. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Oct 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum two-year college teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing centers qualitative research multimodality literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies affect and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  4. Pedagogy Apr 2022
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy creative writing writing across the curriculum teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing program administration technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric literacy studies gender and writing disability studies literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  5. The Peer Review Sep 2021
    Navigating and Adapting Writing Centers through a Pandemic: Justifying Our Work in New Contexts ↗
    Russell Mayo; Russell Mayo; Elise Dixon; Eric Camarillo
    rhetorical criticism cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy two-year college teacher development argument collaborative writing assessment writing centers peer tutoring professional writing digital rhetoric multimodality social media online writing instruction race and writing disability studies editorial matter