Abstract

Over the last seven years, I have spent time across three continents talking to scientists and mathematicians about their beliefs and attitudes and experiences related to writing in their respective disciplines.I have been impressed by the passion and insight with which most have talked about writing and its relationship to critical thinking, and I have often been surprised by how they engage in these practices.For example, rather than working from an a priori hypothesis, many researchers in the STEM disciplines compose backwards, from the results to the introduction.And when reading, many seem to move from the middle of a paper outwards, beginning with the results and method, using an extremely critical eye, and then perhaps scanning out to the introduction and the discussion, or dispensing with these sections altogether.Over and over again, I heard this same story from different scientists, as if it were a secret each alone had stumbled upon.In addition, collaboration, conversation and peer review are very much part of the language of composition that takes place in the sciences (co-authorship, the hierarchies of disciplinary or interdisciplinary teams, the drafting process and the use of technology), but we who work in WID (writing in the disciplines) and WAC (writing across the curriculum) programs are constantly challenged: "How do we teach process in ways that are disciplinarily appropriate?"Historically, we haven't done this well.As Burton and Morgan observed on the training of mathematicians as writers,

Journal
Double Helix
Published
2014-01-01
DOI
10.37514/dbh-j.2014.2.1.04
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (26)

  1. Buxton, C., Allexsaht-Snider, M., & Rivera, C. (2012). Science, language and families: Constructing a model o…
     ↗
  2. Buxton, C., Allexsaht-Snider, M., Suriel, R., Kayumova, S., Choi, Y., Bouton, B., & Land, M. (2013). Using Ed…
     ↗
  3. Chomsky, N. (2004). On nature and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Duff, P. (2011). Language socialization into academic discourse communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguis…
     ↗
  5. Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation…
     ↗
Show all 26 →
  1. Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London, UK: Continuum.
  2. Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbo…
     ↗
  3. Furtak, E. M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2008). Making students' thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An a…
     ↗
  4. Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A secondary analysis of six studies…
     ↗
  5. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
  6. Halliday, M. A. K. (1999). Grammar and the construction of educational knowledge. In R. Berry (Ed.). Language…
  7. Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. London, UK: Continuum.
  8. Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26(1), 55 -88.
     ↗
  9. Huerta, M., Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., & Irby, B. J. (2014). Developing and validating a science notebook rub…
     ↗
  10. Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learn…
     ↗
  11. Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. Lee, O., Penfield, R. D., & Buxton, C. (2011). Relationship between "form" and "content" in science writing a…
     ↗
  13. Levine, G. (2011). Code choice in the language classroom. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     ↗
  14. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The condition of education 2011 (NCES 2011- 033). Washingto…
  15. National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting themes, an…
  16. Rosebery, A. S., & Warren, B. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching science to English language learners: Building on stud…
  17. Shaw, J. M., Bunch, G., & Geaney, E. (2010). Analyzing the language demands facing English learners on scienc…
     ↗
  18. Siegel, M. A. (2007). Striving for equitable classroom assessments for linguistic minorities: Strategies for …
     ↗
  19. Solano-Flores, G. (2008). Who is given tests in what language by whom, when, and where? The need for probabil…
     ↗
  20. Sotelo-Dynega, M., Ortiz, S., Flanagan, D., & Chaplin, W. (2013). English language proficiency and test perfo…
     ↗
  21. Wong Fillmore, L. (2000). Loss of family languages: Should educators be concerned? Theory into Practice, 39(4…
     ↗