Comparing the Readability of English-Language CEO Statements in Chinese and American CSR Reports: A Linguistic Complexity Perspective

Binji Zao Zhejiang International Studies University ; Huiyu Zhang Zhejiang International Studies University

Abstract

Research problem: Taking a linguistic complexity approach, this study conducted a comparative analysis of the readability of English-language CEO statements in Chinese and American corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports. Research question: From a linguistic complexity perspective, are there significant differences in the readability of CEO statements between original American CSR reports and English translations of Chinese CSR reports? If so, what are the lexical, syntactic, and cohesive differences between them? Literature review: Previous studies of CSR reports’ readability primarily employed classic formula-based readability measures, but a systematic analysis from a linguistic complexity perspective is lacking. Scholarly attention to the readability of translated CSR reports is also scant. Methodology: This study collected English-language CEO statements from the CSR reports of American and Chinese top companies and then applied the TAALED and TAALES computational linguistic tools to calculate the lexical complexity, L2SCA to measure the syntactic complexity, and TAACO to gauge the cohesive complexity. Results: The results show that there are considerable linguistic variations between the American and Chinese companies’ reports in terms of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive complexity. The CSR reports produced by Chinese firms are generally less readable than those created by American companies. Specifically, they are characterized by higher informational density, more sophisticated words, longer syntactic length, more coordinate phrases, and more complex nominals, as well as fewer connectives, pronouns, and demonstratives. Conclusion: Our findings enrich the present understanding of the readability of CSR reports and communication through a quantitative linguistic lens, and provide practical insights for the CSR communication of firms from non-English-speaking countries in the context of internationalization.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2025.3615258
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (72) · 11 in this index

  1. Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility
  2. Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022
  3. GRI 1: Foundation 2021
  4. Kyosei An example of cultural keyword argumentatively exploited in corporate reporting d…
    Stud. Commun. Sci.
  5. 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102346
     ↗
Show all 72 →
  1. 10.1111/ijal.12537
     ↗
  2. 10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon
     ↗
  3. 10.1177/1750481311427788
     ↗
  4. 10.1093/applin/amw014
     ↗
  5. 10.1016/j.esp.2024.06.001
     ↗
  6. 10.1002/csr.240
     ↗
  7. 10.1016/j.jcae.2017.05.002
     ↗
  8. 10.1002/csr.1440
     ↗
  9. 10.1037/h0057532
     ↗
  10. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch…
     ↗
  11. The Technique of Clear Writing
  12. 10.1111/1467-9817.12283
     ↗
  13. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  14. 10.3102/0013189x11413260
     ↗
  15. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  16. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  17. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  18. 10.2308/accr-51387
     ↗
  19. 10.1177/1750481319876770
     ↗
  20. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  21. 10.1093/applin/amw058
     ↗
  22. 10.1016/j.esp.2023.01.004
     ↗
  23. 10.1002/csr.2472
     ↗
  24. 10.17398/2340-2784.43.77
     ↗
  25. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  26. 10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo
     ↗
  27. 10.1177/23294884231208176
     ↗
  28. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  29. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  30. 10.1016/j.joi.2019.07.004
     ↗
  31. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  32. 10.1177/002194360203900401
     ↗
  33. Dear stakeholder: Exploring the language of sustainability reporting: A closer look at re…
  34. Some empirical predictors of readability
  35. 10.1007/s11192-016-2036-9
     ↗
  36. 10.1057/9781137388773
     ↗
  37. 10.1177/2329488416675456
     ↗
  38. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  39. 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003
     ↗
  40. 10.3390/su16010260
     ↗
  41. 10.1111/acfi.12938
     ↗
  42. 10.1080/15434303.2020.1844205
     ↗
  43. 10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4
     ↗
  44. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
     ↗
  45. 10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7
     ↗
  46. 10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101262
     ↗
  47. 10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101316
     ↗
  48. 10.1007/s11192-021-04112-9
     ↗
  49. Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexi…
  50. 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101612
     ↗
  51. 10.1016/j.system.2025.103618
     ↗
  52. 10.1093/applin/24.4.492
     ↗
  53. 10.1016/j.system.2023.103002
     ↗
  54. 10.1017/CBO9780511894664
     ↗
  55. 10.1075/pbns
     ↗
  56. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind
  57. Discursive changes in corporate and institutional communication
  58. Written Communication
  59. A multi-dimensional analysis of register features of letters to shareholders by Chinese a…
    Foreign Lang. Teach.
  60. 10.4324/9781315841144
     ↗
  61. Contrastive Studies of Chinese and English
  62. 10.1080/08839514.2024.2340393
     ↗
  63. 10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.12.008
     ↗
  64. 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1305285
     ↗
  65. 10.1177/0021943610364523
     ↗
  66. Financial reporting by Japanese firms on the NYSE: An analysis of linguistic content
    Manage. Int. Rev.
  67. 10.2308/accr-50725
     ↗