Metaphor, Stance, and Identity: A Corpus-Based Study of CEO Letters in Chinese and American Corporate Social Responsibility Reports

Chunyu Hu; Aoran Zhang; Yilin Xu

doi:10.1109/tpc.2024.3358421

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2024

Metaphor, Stance, and Identity: A Corpus-Based Study of CEO Letters in Chinese and American Corporate Social Responsibility Reports

Chunyu Hu Guangdong University of Foreign Studies ; Aoran Zhang ; Yilin Xu Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports are strategic tools for winning stakeholder support and trust through building and maintaining favorable identities and positive images. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review: The metaphorical construction of corporate identity in CSR reports has received little scholarly attention. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions: 1. What are the main genre-specific conceptual metaphors used in Chinese and American CEO letters within CSR corporate reports? 2. How do the metaphors build companies’ corporate identities? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Data and method: We collected 630 Chinese and American CEO letters in CSR reports, identified linguistic metaphors by using the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU), inferred genre-specific conceptual metaphors, and conducted comparative analysis of metaphor-based stance and identity. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results and conclusions: Although Chinese and American companies share several genre-specific conceptual metaphors, there exists variation in the metaphor scenarios used to produce the stances and evaluations that contribute to favorable corporate identity construction. In the economic dimension, companies from both countries portray themselves as “capable builders,” “competent players,” and “hard-working gardeners,” but only Chinese companies identify themselves as “active architects and travelers following national policy.” In the environmental dimension, Chinese companies delineate themselves as “determined environmental protectors” and “faithful friends” of nature, while American companies describe themselves as “environment-conscious travelers”and “responsible stewards” of nature. Both identify themselves as “good corporate citizens” in the social dimension.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2024-03-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2024.3358421
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: modern rhetorical theory genre theory
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (4)

Li et al. (2026)

Strategic CSR Communication: A Comparative Study of Legitimation in Chinese and…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Lambrecht (2025)

“What People Are Saying” About Extreme Weather: A Comparison of Public Commenta…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Zao et al. (2025)

Comparing the Readability of English-Language CEO Statements in Chinese and Ame…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Liu et al. (2025)

Charting the Course of Stance Construction in Container Shipping: An Empirical …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (63) · 3 in this index

10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039403.96150.b6

↗
10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x

↗
Porter (2006)

Strategy and society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social respons…

Harvard Bus. Rev.
10.1002/csr.234

↗
10.1007/s10551-008-9825-x

↗

Show all 63 →

10.1509/jimk.19.2.30

↗
10.1177/0092070303258971

↗
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.689

↗
Yu et al. (2017)

The Generic Structure of CSR Reports in Italian, Chinese, and English: A Corpus…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1108/CCIJ-02-2013-0011

↗
10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.005

↗
10.1093/applin/amw058

↗
10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2485

↗
10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013

↗
Lakoff (1980)

Metaphors We Live By
10.1016/j.esp.2023.01.004

↗
Carroll (2016)

Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management
Cavusgil (2020)

International Business: The New Realities
Elkington (2002)

The Triple Bottom Line
10.1177/0149206311436079

↗
van Riel (1995)

Principles of Corporate Communication
10.1108/EUM0000000006146

↗
10.1108/13563281311319472

↗
10.1002/csr.1399

↗
10.1002/csr.1938

↗
10.1177/1750481311427788

↗
10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon

↗
Sun et al. (2018)

Metaphor Use in Chinese and American CSR Reports

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Yu (2020)

Corporate Environmentalism: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Chinese, American, …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1080/1533015X.2017.1411216

↗
10.1177/1461445605054407

↗
10.1177/00187267035610001

↗
Ashforth (1998)

Epilogue: What have we learned, and where do we go from here
10.1080/01638538809544689

↗
Ochs

Cultural universals in the acquisition of language
10.1075/wll.5.2.06ber

↗
10.1075/pbns.164.07du

↗
10.1177/1750481313494498

↗
10.1177/1750481311427788

↗
10.1075/scl.55

↗
10.5040/9781474295413

↗
10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2

↗
10.1075/cilt.175.07gra

↗
10.4324/9780203931943.ch3

↗
10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray

↗
10.3115/1117729.1117730

↗
10.1515/cllt-2015-0030

↗
10.1080/13546805.2020.1842727

↗
10.1080/10926480709336752

↗
10.2200/s00694ed1v01y201601hlt031

↗
10.1075/celcr.14

↗
10.1080/09296174.2013.830554

↗
10.3115/1117729.1117730

↗
10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.005

↗
10.1075/rcl.00140.xu

↗
10.1177/160940690600500104

↗
Lakoff (1999)

Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.005

↗
10.1057/s41599-019-0252-7

↗
Hofstede (2001)

Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across…
10.1017/CBO9780511614408

↗
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001

↗
10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.011

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Metaphor, Stance, and Identity: A Corpus-Based Study of CEO Letters in Chinese and American Corporate Social Responsibility Reports

Abstract

Citation context

Cited by in this index (4)

References (63) · 3 in this index

Related articles