Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Dec 2024

Exploring Employee Perceptions of Technology Media Influence on Supervisory Relationships

Jennifer E. Fairweather ; Julie Bilodeau Johnson & Wales University

Abstract

In today’s workplace, supervisors often communicate with direct reports using technology that could influence the perceived relationship employees have with their managers. The purpose of this convergent mixed methods study was to describe the perception of how media richness, when using technology to communicate, influences the relationship direct reports have with their supervisors. To address the research question, a survey was used with a sample of 100 direct reports who frequently receive communication from their supervisors in different technology formats. The results from the study suggest that technology media influences the perceived relationship between direct reports and their supervisors. According to the results of this study, technology media may be especially helpful in bolstering the availability of supervisors, which may positively influence other elements of the supervisory relationship. The results further suggest that it may be important for all leaders to choose technology media that is personalized and preferred by the employee while also using the most effective media for the type of message. Finally, leaders should understand the concerns that employees may have around privacy and overuse of technology media.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
10.1177/23294906241301413
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (47)

  1. Achievers Solutions Inc. (n.d.) Engagement and retention report. Achievers. https://www.achievers.com/wp-cont…
  2. Adams T., Reinert M., Fritze D., Nguyen T. (n.d.). Mind the workplace report. MHANational. https://mhanationa…
  3. Agovino T. (2019). To have and to hold amid one of the tightest labor markets in the past 50 years, employee …
  4. 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9
     ↗
  5. 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008
     ↗
Show all 47 →
  1. 10.12735/jbm.v4i3p34
     ↗
  2. 10.1037/tmb0000030
     ↗
  3. Bass B. (1994)
    Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership
  4. 10.1111/joop.12041
     ↗
  5. 10.1111/jan.12165
     ↗
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). The economics daily, quits rate of 2.9 percent …
  7. 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021841.01346.35
     ↗
  8. Cohen J. (1988)
    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  9. 10.5465/amj.2016.4003
     ↗
  10. Creswell J. W. (2018)
    Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches
  11. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
     ↗
  12. 10.1108/09699980710780728
     ↗
  13. 10.2307/25148857
     ↗
  14. Divleli M. (2015)
    International Journal of Management and Human Resources
  15. 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0099
     ↗
  16. 10.1111/ap.12269
     ↗
  17. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004
     ↗
  18. 10.1177/001316448904900315
     ↗
  19. Heen M. S. (2014)
    Center for Crime and Justice Policy
  20. 10.3233/HSM-2002-21305
     ↗
  21. 10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_14
     ↗
  22. Imran M. (2019)
    Journal of Managerial Sciences
  23. 10.1002/hbe2.138
     ↗
  24. 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
     ↗
  25. Lee C. E. (2010)
    International Journal for the Advancement of Science & Arts
  26. Long C. S. (2014)
    World Applied Sciences Journal
  27. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.04.001
     ↗
  28. Mahan T. F., Nelms D., Bearden C., Pearce B. (n.d.). 2019 retention report - workinstitute.com. Work Institut…
  29. 10.1177/0893318914524536
     ↗
  30. 10.4102/ac.v11i1.144
     ↗
  31. 10.1007/s10726-008-9142-x
     ↗
  32. 10.21833/ijaas.2017.03.017
     ↗
  33. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004
     ↗
  34. 10.1177/1548051817709007
     ↗
  35. Ruggieri S. (2013)
    Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET
  36. 10.1002/jls.20164
     ↗
  37. Savolainen T. (2014)
    Journal of Global Business Issues
  38. 10.1177/0893318904265803
     ↗
  39. 10.1108/JOEPP-05-2017-0046
     ↗
  40. 10.1080/165019701300006542
     ↗
  41. 10.2224/sbp.2016.44.7.1201
     ↗
  42. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.012
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Assessing Writing Oct 2026
    Effects of varying time constraints on quality, linguistic features, and fluency behaviors in L2 writing ↗
    Jongbong Lee; Charlene Polio
    argument assessment empirical research multilingual writers affect and writing
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2026
    Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Study of Students’ and LSPs’ Perceptions of Translation Internships ↗
    Shuang Liu
    collaborative writing assessment professional writing empirical research book reviews
  3. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    Assessing the effects of explicit coherence instruction on EFL students’ integrated writing performance ↗
    Xi Li; Mo Chen
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development assessment empirical research multilingual writers
  4. Computers and Composition Sep 2025
    When collaborating turns into dishonesty: A data-driven heuristic comparing human and AI collaborators ↗
    John R. Gallagher; Kyle Wagner; Jordan Canzonetta
    collaborative writing empirical research artificial intelligence
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2025
    Professionalizing Researchers: Mapping and Visualizing Doctoral Engineering Student Identity Development Through User-Experience (UX) Methods ↗
    Jason Tham; Diego A. Polanco-Lahoz; Madison Hanson; Jennifer Cross; Mario Beruvides
    curriculum design graduate education collaborative writing assessment empirical research qualitative research book reviews