Effects of varying time constraints on quality, linguistic features, and fluency behaviors in L2 writing

Jongbong Lee Hankuk University of Foreign Studies ; Charlene Polio Michigan State University

Abstract

Although previous research has explored how L2 writers allocate their time and how time limits influence writing scores, many of these studies focus solely on final texts, providing only a partial understanding of the writing process. A more comprehensive investigation is essential for enhancing the construct validity of writing assessments. Drawing on empirical research on timed writing and on theoretical models of the writing process, this study explores how time constraints affect L2 learners' written texts and fluency behaviors. A total of 123 participants (60 high-intermediate and 63 advanced EFL learners) completed an argumentative writing task with keystroke logging software under either a 30-minute or 60-minute condition, and stimulated recalls were conducted with a subset. The texts were analyzed for syntactic and lexical complexity, fluency, and overall quality. Results indicate that time constraints did not significantly affect linguistic complexity or writing quality, although fluency behaviors differed across conditions. Time constraints thus affected learners' writing processes more than the linguistic quality of their texts. The core implication for L2 writing assessment is that, for test takers experienced with timed writing, shortening the time allotted to an argumentative task changes composing processes without compromising the product-based scores on which assessment decisions rest.

Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2026.101123
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (39) · 7 in this index

  1. Toward a new process-based indicator for measuring writing fluency: Evidence from L2 writ…
    Canadian Modern Language Review  ↗
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. The validity of timed essay tests in the assessment of writing skills
    ELT Journal  ↗
  4. Written Communication
  5. Comparing perspectives on L2 writing: Multiple analyses of a common corpus
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
Show all 39 →
  1. Diagnosing the support needs of second language writers: Does the time allowance matter?
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Effects of amount of time allowed on the Test of Written English. (Research Report No. 92–27)
  4. Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexi…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  5. Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition
  6. A model of working memory in writing
    The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications
  7. Journal of Writing Research
  8. Written Communication
  9. Validity and fairness implications of varying time conditions on a diagnostic test of aca…
    System  ↗
  10. The role of cognitive factors in second language writing and writing to learn a second language
    Studies in Second Language Acquisition  ↗
  11. What does time buy? ESL student performance on home versus class compositions
    Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom
  12. Using corpus analysis to extend experimental research: Genre effects in L2 writing
    System  ↗
  13. The effect of additional time on the quality of argumentation in L2 writing assessment: A…
    Language Assessment Quarterly  ↗
  14. Analysing keystroke logging data from a linguistic perspective
    Observing Writing
  15. Written Communication
  16. Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing
    International Journal of Corpus Linguistics  ↗
  17. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ES…
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  18. MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversi…
    Behavior Research Methods  ↗
  19. Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix
  20. NCTE. (2014). Guidelines for selection of materials in English language arts programs. Retrieved from: https:…
  21. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity
    Applied Linguistics  ↗
  22. The association between TOEFL iBT® test scores and the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) levels (Research Memorandum No. RM-15-06)
  23. Effects of applying different time limits to a proposed GRE writing test
    Journal of Educational Measurement  ↗
  24. R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  25. Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity
    Language Learning  ↗
  26. The foreign language writer’s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing pr…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  27. The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and…
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  28. Computers and Composition
  29. The effect of timing on the quantity and quality of test-takers’ writing
    New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics
  30. Mapping the relationships among the cognitive complexity of independent writing tasks, L2 writing quality, and complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
  31. Investigating the interactions among genre, task complexity, and proficiency in L2 writing: A comprehensive text analysis and study of learner perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
  32. The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  33. Speededness as a source of test bias for non-native English speakers on the college level academic skills test (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
  34. The effects of time constraints, genre, and proficiency on L2 writing fluency behaviors and linguistic outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)