Journal of Writing Analytics Jan 2018 Open Access

Is this Too Polite? The Limited Use of Rhetorical Moves in a First-Year Corpus

Thomas Peele City College of New York

Abstract

Background: The researchers conducted a corpus analysis of 548 research-based argument essays, totalling 1,465,091 words, written by first-year students at The City College of New York (CCNY). The purpose of this study was to better understand the ways in which CCNY students were constructing arguments in research essays in order to better support our instruction of the research essay. Curricular guidelines for the research assignment are general. Instructors are directed to require a research-based, persuasive argument that includes conflicting points of view. Model assignment sheets are provided to instructors, but they are free to write their own. Assignment sheets are not collected or approved. In the fall semester in which this corpus was collected, over 70 part-time instructors taught approximately 120 sections of the first- or second-semester composition course.Literature Review: The study of The City College of New York Corpus (CCNYC) partially replicates and relies on the analysis of three corpora of academic writing conducted by Zak Lancaster (2016a) in his examination of Gerald Graff’s and Cathy Birkenstein’s textbook They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing (2014). The current study also compares the CCNYC findings to studies of stance and voice markers frequency conducted by Ken Hyland (2012) and Ellen Barton (1993) and suggests the classroom use of corpus analysis as described by Raith Abid and Shakila Manan (2015), and Maggie Charles (2007).Research Questions: The study was guided by a narrowly-focused interest in learning whether or not the CCNYC would demonstrate the range and distribution of rhetorical moves that Lancaster found in his study of academic writing (2016a). The analysis of the corpus consists of frequency counts; we did not conduct other statistical analyses. Since we had little prior experience with corpus analysis, we wondered what would be revealed about students’ writing practices by a partial replication of Lancaster’s study. We did not reproduce Lancaster’s analysis but relied on his publised results. This study served as an assessment tool, providing a microscopic view of a limited number of rhetorical moves across a large corpus of student essays. As a result of our study, we hoped to be able to create assignments for research essays that responded directly to the patterns that we saw in our students’ essays.Methodology: Modeled on Lancaster’s study and the templates of rhetorical moves offered by Graff and Birkenstein, concordances of terms used to introduce objections, offer concessions, and make counterarguments were drawn from the CCNYC and then analyzed to confirm that the rhetorical form was in fact functioning as one of the above rhetorical moves within the context of the essay in which it was found.Results: Our study demonstrates that CCNY students use fewer linguistic resources than their peers at other institutions, a finding that helps shape faculty development seminars. The corpus analysis reveals that while CCNY students introduce objections to their arguments at about the same rates as in other corpora, they are less likely to concede to those objections. In addition, when students made counterarguments, they used only a limited range of the linguistic resources available to them.Conclusions: The low rate of engagement with opposing points of view and the limited use of linguistic resources for counterarguments all suggest the potential value of focused, corpus-based instruction.

Journal
Journal of Writing Analytics
Published
2018-01-01
DOI
10.37514/jwa-j.2018.2.1.04
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Slagle (2025)
    Effort is All You Need: The Possibilities of Writing Analytics
    Journal of Writing Analytics
  2. Palmquist (2019)
    Directions in Writing Analytics: Some Suggestions
    Journal of Writing Analytics
  3. Lang et al. (2019)
    A Taxonomy for Writing Analytics
    Journal of Writing Analytics

References (23) · 5 in this index

  1. Abid, R., & Manan, S. (2015). Integrating corpus linguistics in critical literacy pedagogy: A case study of L…
     ↗
  2. Anthony, L. (2018). AntConc (Version 3.5.7) Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available fr…
  3. Aull (2017)
    Corpus Analysis of Argumentative Versus Explanatory Discourse in Writing Task Genres
    Journal of Writing Analytics
  4. Aull et al. (2014)
    Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-b…
    Written Communication
  5. Barton (1993)
    Evidentials, Argumentation, and Epistemological Stance
    College English
Show all 23 →
  1. Bawarshi (2000)
    The Genre Function
    College English
  2. Bawarshi, A., & Reiff, M.J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West L…
  3. Bullock, R. (2016). The Norton field guide to writing (4th ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
  4. Chang, P., & Schleppegrell, M. (2011). Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the l…
     ↗
  5. Charles, M. (2007). Reconciling top-down and bottom-up approaches to graduate writing: Using a corpus to teac…
     ↗
  6. Chen, Y., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in l1 and l2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology…
     ↗
  7. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2015). Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology driven ma…
     ↗
  8. Devitt, A. (2014). Genre pedagogies. In G. Tate, A. R. Taggart, K. Schick, & H. B. Hessler (Eds.), A guide to…
  9. Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing (3rd ed.). N…
  10. Hyland, K. (2012). Undergraduate understandings: Stance and voice in final year reports. In K. Hyland (Ed.), …
     ↗
  11. Jiang, F. (2015). Nominal stance construction in l1 and l2 students' writing. Journal of English for Academic…
     ↗
  12. Lancaster (2016)
    Do Academics Really Write This Way? A Corpus Investigation of Moves and Templat…
    College Composition and Communication
  13. Lancaster, Z. (2016b). Expressing stance in undergraduate academic writing: Discipline-specific and general q…
     ↗
  14. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
     ↗
  15. Pérez-Llantada, C. (2015). Languages in the forefront, genres in the background: The scope of genre analysis …
     ↗
  16. Poole, R. (2016). A corpus-aided approach for the teaching and learning of rhetoric in an undergraduate compo…
     ↗
  17. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge.
  18. The City College of New York (2017). City facts. Retrieved from www.ccny.cuny.edu/institutionalresearch/cityfacts
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Journal of Writing Analytics Jan 2018
    Placing Writing Tasks in Local and Global Contexts: The Case of Argumentative Writing ↗
    Hannah Ringler
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education argument assessment writing program administration quantitative research book reviews
  2. Pedagogy Apr 2024
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2023
    The State of UX Pedagogy ↗
    Philip B. Gallagher; Guiseppe Getto
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication book reviews
  4. Pedagogy Oct 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum two-year college teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing centers qualitative research multimodality literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies affect and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  5. Pedagogy Oct 2022
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication archival research multimodality gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter