Abstract
Advocates a position on the margins of English studies. Provides a general introduction to analytic philosophy of language. Elaborates Donald Davidson’s work on interpretation, which demonstrates why truth and rationality are inextricably linked to language and communication. Calls for reconfiguring the debate between and assessment of the disparate methodologies of English studies.
- Journal
- College English
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/ce19983693
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Assessing Writing Oct 2026Replicating and expanding a validity argument for eRevise as a formative assessment: Empirical support for theories of conceptual change ↗Richard Correnti; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Elaine Lin Wang; Diane Litman; Zhexiong Liu; Haoran Zhang; Tianwen Li
-
Assessing Writing Oct 2026Effects of varying time constraints on quality, linguistic features, and fluency behaviors in L2 writing ↗Jongbong Lee; Charlene Polio
-
Argumentation Aug 2026Dorottya Egres
-
Argumentation Mar 2026Experimental Insights into the Influence of Logic and Pragmatics on Conditional Argument Evaluation ↗Ermioni Seremeta; Monique Flecken; Menno Reijven; Jean Wagemans
-
Assessing Writing Jan 2026The effects of online resource use on L2 learners’ computer-mediated writing processes and written products ↗Honglan Wang; Jookyoung Jung