College English Nov 2004

Opinion: The Vexation of Class

Nick Tingle

Abstract

m ecently reprinted in Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, David Bartholomae's the University is now a recognized classic in the field of composition theory. I admired the article, when I first read it over twenty years ago, as a telling criticism of writing as process. I also found it vexing, and still do. I use my vexation with Inventing as a catalyst for rumination on my social trajectory. My vexation is intimately related my passage from the working the middle class. I read Inventing as the negation both of my own educational experience as a member of the working class and of the pedagogy I employ as a teacher of writing with middle-class students. It is a tribute the power of Inventing, now seen as an early example of social constructionism, that I am not the only person more recently vexed by it. Thomas Newkirk and Nancy Welch are also. I use their particular responses Inventing as a way define my own. Newkirk points more my problem with the implications of Inventing for my view of education: making the move into university discourse is not simply a matter of inventing but also of uprooting. Welch points more my problem with Inventing as implying a narrative of academic socialization distinctly different from the socializing process I underwent. At the core of Inventing is Bartholomae's analysis of the function of the commonplace in student writing. He illustrates his claims through reference short student writings produced in response a prompt on creativity. One student writes, Creativity me, means being free express yourself in a way that is unique you (148). Bartholomae comments that with his use of to me the student appropriates a commonplace as his own. Further, this act of appropriation constitutes his as a writer (149). Bartholomae argues that one's authority as an academic

Journal
College English
Published
2004-11-01
DOI
10.2307/4140719
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (15)

  1. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  2. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  3. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  4. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  5. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
Show all 15 →
  1. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  2. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  3. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  4. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  5. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  6. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  7. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  8. Bollig (2019)
    “People Like Us”: Theorizing First-Generation College as a Marker of Difference
    Literacy in Composition Studies
  9. Mack (2006)
    Ethical Representation of Working-Class Lives: Multiple Genres, Voices, and Ide…
    Pedagogy
  10. Virtanen (2006)
    Brad, Sean, and James: Saying What They Mean in Voices that Sound Like Themselves
    Open Words: Access and English Studies

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. College Composition and Communication May 1996
    Romancing Rhetorics: Social Expressivist Perspectives on the Teaching of Writing ↗
    Sherrie L. Gradin
    composition theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development editorial matter
  2. College Composition and Communication Oct 1995
    Constructing Writers: Barrett Wendell's Pedagogy at Harvard ↗
    Sue Carter Simmons
    rhetorical criticism composition theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development
  3. Rhetoric Review Sep 1994
    Toward a pedagogy of the enthymeme: The roles of dialogue, intention, and function in shaping argument ↗
    Barbara A. Emmel
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly Jan 1989
    The course in classical rhetoric: Definition, development, direction ↗
    Theresa Enos
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism composition theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy graduate education teacher development public rhetoric
  5. College English Mar 1982
    Alexander Bain's Contributions to Discourse Theory ↗
    Andrea A. Lunsford
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism composition theory discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development