College Composition and Communication May 1976

Self-Evaluation Strategies of Extensive Revisers and Nonrevisers

Richard Beach University of Minnesota System

Abstract

Preview this article: Self-Evaluation Strategies of Extensive Revisers and Nonrevisers, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/27/2/collegecompositionandcommunication16583-1.gif

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
1976-05-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc197616583
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 28 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Assessing Writing Oct 2026
    Replicating and expanding a validity argument for eRevise as a formative assessment: Empirical support for theories of conceptual change ↗
    Richard Correnti; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Elaine Lin Wang; Diane Litman; Zhexiong Liu; Haoran Zhang; Tianwen Li
    argument threshold concepts assessment artificial intelligence
  2. Assessing Writing Oct 2026
    Effects of varying time constraints on quality, linguistic features, and fluency behaviors in L2 writing ↗
    Jongbong Lee; Charlene Polio
    argument assessment empirical research multilingual writers affect and writing
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric Dec 2024
    Sophisms and Contempt for Autonomy ↗
    Katharina Stevens
    argument assessment
  4. Assessing Writing Jul 2024
    Examining the direct and indirect impacts of verbatim source use on linguistic complexity in integrated argumentative writing assessment ↗
    Huiying Cai; Xun Yan
    argument assessment
  5. Written Communication Apr 2024
    A Direct Functional Measure of Text Quality: Did the Reader Understand? ↗
    Joachim Grabowski; Moti Mathiebe
    assessment