Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2008

Graphics and Ethos in Biomedical Journals

David Hutto Juniata College

Abstract

This article describes a study that examined the tables and figures in articles from a basic research journal, The Journal of Cell Biology, and compared them to tables and figures from an applied medical journal, The New England Journal of Medicine. Comparison of graphics between the two journals shows sharp differences in terms of range of graphics types, visual consistency within and between articles, or use of color. As the articles take into account what is needed by different audiences, the graphics help to build the credibility of the journal. The study also addresses the question of how scientific visuals contribute to the persuasiveness of a writer, looking at how the graphics within an article affect the credibility or ethos of the writer.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2008-04-01
DOI
10.2190/tw.38.2.b
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Fahler et al. (2019)
    Data Power in Writing: Assigning Data Analysis in a General Education Linguisti…
    Across the Disciplines
  2. Reed (2018)
    Building on Bibliography: Toward Useful Categorization of Research in Rhetorics…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Hannah et al. (2018)
    Mapping the Terrain: Examining the Conditions for Alignment Between the Rhetori…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Buehl (2014)
    Toward an Ethical Rhetoric of the Digital Scientific Image: Learning From the E…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Wickman (2013)
    Observing Inscriptions at Work: Visualization and Text Production in Experiment…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Hoover (2010)
    The Impact of NSF and NIH Websites on Researcher Ethics
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (25) · 5 in this index

  1. Latour B. (1990)
    Representation in Scientific Practice
  2. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00078-9
     ↗
  3. 10.1353/con.2004.0023
     ↗
  4. 10.1038/23379
     ↗
  5. 10.1080/00335639009383910
     ↗
Show all 25 →
  1. Hass et al. (2003)
    The Rhetoric of Junk Science
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Kumpf (2000)
    Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Bell et al. (2000)
    ‘Aristotle's pharmacy’: The medical rhetoric of a clinical protocol in the drug…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. 10.1353/con.2004.0016
     ↗
  5. Bastide F. (1990)
    Representation in Scientific Practice
  6. Myers G. (1990)
    Representation in Scientific Practice
  7. Fahnestock (2004)
    Preserving the Figure: Consistency in the Presentation of Scientific Arguments
    Written Communication
  8. Richards (2003)
    Argument and Authority in the Visual Representations of Science
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Prelli L. J. (1989)
    A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse
  10. Lynch M. (1990)
    Representation in Scientific Practice
  11. Aristotle (1991)
    On Rhetoric
  12. 10.1083/jcb.200504097
     ↗
  13. 10.1056/NEJMoa060838
     ↗
  14. 10.1083/jcb.200507073
     ↗
  15. 10.1083/jcb.200512136
     ↗
  16. 10.1083/jcb.200508154
     ↗
  17. 10.1056/NEJMoa055104
     ↗
  18. 10.1056/NEJMoa050156
     ↗
  19. Hutto David (2007)
    Technical Communication
  20. Hutto David (2003)
    Technical Communication Quarterly
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Assessing Writing Oct 2026
    Effects of varying time constraints on quality, linguistic features, and fluency behaviors in L2 writing ↗
    Jongbong Lee; Charlene Polio
    argument assessment empirical research multilingual writers affect and writing
  2. Argumentation Jun 2026
    Sensitivity to Quality Variations of Conflicting Arguments ↗
    Jos Hornikx; Stefanie van Doorn-Kemperman
    argument affect and writing
  3. Argumentation Apr 2026
    Linguistic Choices and Argumentative Effects: An Experimental Investigation of Presentational Means in the ‘Van Gelder’ Court Case ↗
    Maarten van Leeuwen; Hannah De Mulder; Astrid den Hollander
    argument affect and writing
  4. Argumentation Feb 2026
    When Emmanuel Macron Goes Social: Using Social Media Influencers as a Rhetorical Strategy ↗
    Keren Sadoun-Kerber
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument collaborative writing social media affect and writing
  5. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    The effects of online resource use on L2 learners’ computer-mediated writing processes and written products ↗
    Honglan Wang; Jookyoung Jung
    revision argument assessment digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics affect and writing