Abstract

Functional complexity is a widespread and underresearched phenomenon in Web sites. This article explores a specific case of functional complexity by analyzing the content of UNESCO World Heritage Web sites, which have to meet demands from both World Heritage and tourism perspectives. Based on a functional analysis, a content checklist was developed and used to evaluate a sample of 30 World Heritage Web sites. The results show that World Heritage Web sites generally fall short in all content categories. A cluster analysis reveals three types of World Heritage Web sites based on their emphasis on World Heritage content versus tourism content: (a) less well-developed Web sites (no emphasis), (b) Web sites of World Heritage Sites with touristic possibilities (emphasis on World Heritage), and (c) Web sites of touristic attractions with outstanding cultural or natural value (emphasis on tourism). In all, the findings show that functional complexity poses serious threats to the exhaustiveness of a Web site’s information and that evaluation approaches based on functional analysis can be useful in detecting blindspots in the content provided.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2018-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651918762029
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (55) · 5 in this index

  1. 10.1186/s13673-015-0040-3
     ↗
  2. 10.1080/09669580408667225
     ↗
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. 10.1080/09669582.2014.978787
     ↗
  5. 10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365966
     ↗
Show all 55 →
  1. 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.007
     ↗
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Over de grenzen van de taalbeheersing. Onderzoek naar taal, tekst en communicatie
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Technical Communication
  6. 10.1002/jtr.297
     ↗
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. 10.1080/09669582.2014.998678
     ↗
  9. Technical Communication
  10. 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00094-8
     ↗
  11. 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003
     ↗
  12. 10.1016/j.tmp.2012.12.002
     ↗
  13. 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.009
     ↗
  14. 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.01.014
     ↗
  15. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.011
     ↗
  16. Technical Communication
  17. 10.1080/09669582.2013.864660
     ↗
  18. 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00090-5
     ↗
  19. 10.1515/9783110926835
     ↗
  20. 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.016
     ↗
  21. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.06.006
     ↗
  22. Technical Communication
  23. 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.013
     ↗
  24. 10.1108/20441261211223289
     ↗
  25. 10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.005
     ↗
  26. 10.1016/j.tourman.2004.02.018
     ↗
  27. Technical Communication
  28. 10.1260/2047-4970.1.0.101
     ↗
  29. Usability inspection methods
  30. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.031
     ↗
  31. 10.1177/0047287512465959
     ↗
  32. 10.1007/s10109-013-0184-5
     ↗
  33. 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.02.011
     ↗
  34. Discourse analysis and evaluation: Functional approaches
     ↗
  35. 10.1080/10598650.2013.11510774
     ↗
  36. 10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365998
     ↗
  37. Web site usability. A designer’s guide
  38. 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.04.005
     ↗
  39. Technical Communication
  40. 10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
     ↗
  41. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.009
     ↗
  42. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2012). Knowledge management for culture a…
  43. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2013). Operational guidelines for the imp…
  44. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2014). World Heritage List. Retrieved fro…
  45. Technical Communication
  46. Technical Communication
  47. Technical Communication
  48. 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.008
     ↗
  49. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  50. 10.1080/13683500.2014.912204
     ↗