Abstract

Three studies examined the “myside bias” in reasoning, evaluating written arguments, and writing argumentative essays. Previous research suggests that some people possess a fact-based argumentation schema and some people have a balanced argumentation schema. I developed reliable Likert scale instruments (1-7 rating) for these constructs and conducted an evaluation of instrument validity and reliability. A myside bias in argumentative essays was predicted by the fact-based and balanced argumentation schema instruments using these individual-difference measures. Strength of opinion predicted the myside bias in generating reasons but not in writing argumentative essays. There was a weak but significant correlation between the myside bias in generating reasons and writing argumentative essays. In evaluating written arguments, the fact-based schema instrument predicted agreement and quality ratings for claims supported by factual but not nonfactual reasons. Ratings of the quality of rebutted arguments were predicted by the measures of individual differences in argumentation schemata.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2012-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088312457909
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication

References (37) · 5 in this index

  1. Informal reasoning and education
  2. 10.1080/13546789508256909
     ↗
  3. Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender related patterns in students’ intellectual development
  4. 10.1080/01638530701739207
     ↗
  5. 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00002-0
     ↗
Show all 37 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Harvey J. T. (2012). The terrifying Texas GOP platform. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/jo…
  3. 10.3102/00346543067001088
     ↗
  4. 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2
     ↗
  5. 10.1016/0193-3973(81)90032-0
     ↗
  6. 10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
     ↗
  7. 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.05.003
     ↗
  8. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
     ↗
  9. 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
     ↗
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.562
     ↗
  11. Thinking across cultures: The third international conference on thinking
  12. Perkins D. N., Bushey B., Farady M. (1986). Learning to reason. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Graduate Scho…
  13. Informal reasoning
  14. Forms of intellectual and ethical development during the college years: A scheme
  15. Republican Party of Texas. (2012). 2012 state Republican Party platform. Retrieved from http://www.texasgop.o…
  16. 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.001
     ↗
  17. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.001
     ↗
  18. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
     ↗
  19. 10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.161
     ↗
  20. 10.1080/13546780600780796
     ↗
  21. 10.1002/acp.915
     ↗
  22. The uses of argument
  23. Argumentation
  24. Argumentation
  25. 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.003
     ↗
  26. 10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00024-9
     ↗
  27. Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach
  28. Written Communication
  29. Paper presented at the 44th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society
  30. 10.1080/13546780701527674
     ↗
  31. Written Communication
  32. 10.3758/BRM.41.3.691
     ↗