Abstract

As essential as positionality is to qualitative research involving engagement with research participants, contemporary scholarly discussion of positionality is mainly aimed at educating emerging researchers about acknowledging their own subjectivities. In turn, there is little consensus regarding how authors should address positionality in writing for research publication. Emphasizing the importance of written positionality as a component of research transparency, this article proposes a framework for positionality in ethnographic research writing. The author collected 59 ethnographies published in peer-reviewed academic journals to study the extent to which researcher positionality is established or can be inferred through the writing of research. The analysis identifies a series of considerations for research writing such as the form of writing, sociocultural identities, relationships with research participants, and the resulting implications. The author proposes this framework as a guide for qualitative researchers who benefit from explicitly situating themselves in the research process through their writing.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2022-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221114152
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Computers and Composition

References (55) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.1111/joms.12356
     ↗
  2. 10.1111/anhu.12326
     ↗
  3. 10.1086/692825
     ↗
  4. 10.1177/1468794107085301
     ↗
  5. 10.1177/1049732318812448
     ↗
Show all 55 →
  1. 10.1080/17450101.2017.1292056
     ↗
  2. 10.4135/9781526430212.n23
     ↗
  3. New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty
  4. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods
  5. 10.1080/17457823.2019.1582348
     ↗
  6. 10.1177/0890334419830990
     ↗
  7. 10.1017/CBO9781139169202
     ↗
  8. Written Communication
  9. 10.1080/2159676X.2013.796487
     ↗
  10. 10.4135/9781529716634
     ↗
  11. Being reflexive in critical educational and social research
  12. Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences
  13. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
  14. González y, González E. M., Lincoln Y. S. (2006). Decolonizing qualitative research: Non-traditional reportin…
  15. 10.1177/1468794119891583
     ↗
  16. 10.1177/0959354308101417
     ↗
  17. 10.1146/annurev.an.05.100176.001553
     ↗
  18. 10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
     ↗
  19. 10.1080/14759551.2019.1601722
     ↗
  20. 10.25071/2291-5796.43
     ↗
  21. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.001
     ↗
  22. 10.1080/17439884.2019.1639191
     ↗
  23. 10.1080/17470211003602412
     ↗
  24. Designing and conducting ethnographic research: An introduction
  25. 10.1108/HE-10-2016-0053
     ↗
  26. 10.1515/text-2020-2073
     ↗
  27. 10.1108/S1042-319220160000014017
     ↗
  28. 10.1177/1049732317748896
     ↗
  29. 10.20533/ijtie.2047.0533.2016.0096
     ↗
  30. 10.18061/dsq.v33i2.3708
     ↗
  31. 10.1080/14616688.2017.1387810
     ↗
  32. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue
  33. 10.1177/0001839219887663
     ↗
  34. Sandelowski M. (1998). Writing a good read: Strategies for re-presenting qualitative data. Research in Nursin…
     ↗
  35. Initiating ethnographic research: A mixed methods approach
  36. 10.1177/1468794119841839
     ↗
  37. 10.1177/1468794105048657
     ↗
  38. 10.1080/14427591.2017.1378119
     ↗
  39. Written Communication
  40. 10.1017/S1049096519002233
     ↗
  41. 10.31219/osf.io/6efvp
     ↗
  42. Written Communication
  43. 10.4324/9780203097076
     ↗
  44. 10.1177/1077800410383121
     ↗
  45. Tregaskis C. (2004). Identity, positionality and power: Issues for disabled researchers. A response paper to …
     ↗
  46. 10.1037/qup0000062
     ↗
  47. Wallace E. R., Adams J. D., Fullwood C. C., Horhn E.B., Loritts C. (2020). The Black feminist mixtape: A coll…
  48. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01974.x
     ↗
  49. 10.1007/s00163-018-00304-2
     ↗
  50. 10.1007/s12182-020-00473-7
     ↗