Abstract

The use of subordination enables language users to achieve syntactic efficiency by allowing them to connect ideas in temporal/logical relation. Although the importance of subordination has been recognized in previous research on second language (L2) writing, it has been typically assessed with global indices that measure overall ratio of subordination. In order to capture more nuanced patterns in the development of L2 writing, this study measures the sophistication of subordination, considering subordination type (adverbialization, complementization, relativization) and finiteness (finite, nonfinite). Our natural language processing analysis of 6,566 timed impromptu essays using the Subordination Sophistication Analyzer 1.0 showed that higher-proficiency L2 learners used more subordination, and, importantly, their patterns of use differed by subordination type and finiteness. Whereas the amount of adverbialization and relativization increased along with proficiency regardless of finiteness, the use of complementization increased only for nonfinite clauses. The broader impacts of this study for education and assessment are discussed.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883241286900
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (40) · 6 in this index

  1. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
     ↗
  2. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     ↗
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     ↗
  4. 10.5054/tq.2011.244483
     ↗
  5. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005
     ↗
Show all 40 →
  1. 10.3758/s13428-020-01456-7
     ↗
  2. The Journal of Asia TEFL
  3. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment
  4. Written Communication
  5. 10.1093/applin/amz069
     ↗
  6. 10.1017/9781108643689
     ↗
  7. Written Communication
  8. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9
     ↗
  9. 10.3366/cor.2015.0068
     ↗
  10. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective
  11. Hardt M., Recht B. (2023). Patterns, predictions, and actions: A story about machine learning. Princeton Univ…
  12. Criterial features in L2 English: Specifying the reference levels of the Common European …
  13. Written Communication
  14. Honnibal M., Montani I. (2019). spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with bloom embeddings, convolutional …
  15. Elementary English
  16. 10.1093/applin/amac046
     ↗
  17. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666
     ↗
  18. Written Communication
  19. 10.1075/ijlcr.00019.int
     ↗
  20. 10.1177/0265532217712554
     ↗
  21. 10.1093/applin/amu047
     ↗
  22. 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962
     ↗
  23. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.016
     ↗
  24. 10.5054/tq.2011.240859
     ↗
  25. Children writing: A reader
  26. Written Communication
  27. The English national curriculum
  28. 10.1093/applin/amp044
     ↗
  29. R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Co…
  30. First Yonsei Corpus Symposium
  31. 10.3389/feduc.2020.589965
     ↗
  32. 10.1007/978-81-322-1020-7
     ↗
  33. 10.1515/cllt-2017-0002
     ↗
  34. Written Communication
  35. 10.1177/0267658320958742
     ↗