Abstract
emphasis upon scholarly rather than pedagogical training for Ph.D. candidates, but a few enlightened souls have lately begun to sound clear and public warnings of the problem that exists. Henry WV. Sams, for example, has argued that we must awaken our fledgling colleagues to the fact that their responsibilities go somewhat further than establishing themselves as scholars, critics, and overpowering young polymaths (The Audiences of English, CE, Feb. 1964). Recognizing the problem, however, is only the first step; an analysis of its conditions must follow, from which criticism and suggestions for change may proceed.
- Journal
- College English
- Published
- 1964-12-01
- DOI
- 10.2307/373596
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Assessing Writing Jul 2026Examining linguistic reasoning and metalinguistic strategies in L2 writing: Insights from teacher- and AI-feedback revisions ↗Huican Huo; Lawrence Jun Zhang
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2026Jason Hockaday
-
Assessing Writing Jan 2026Assessing the effects of explicit coherence instruction on EFL students’ integrated writing performance ↗Xi Li; Mo Chen
-
Writing and Pedagogy Dec 2025Zhaozhe Wang
-
Written Communication Jul 2025Synthesizing Professional Knowledge and Racial Literacy Content Through Explicit Composing Instruction: A Discourse Synthesis Study ↗Jenifer Jasinski Schneider; James R. King; Gretchen Dodson