IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2023

Planning for Difference: Preparing Students to Create Flexible and Elaborated Team Charters that Can Adapt to Support Diverse Teams

Maria Feuer Vermont State Hospital ; Joanna Wolfe Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background:</b> A robust body of research supports the use of team charters to purposefully create a team culture with shared norms and expectations. However, student teams often treat this requirement as busywork and fail to invest the effort needed to create team charters that prepare the team to adapt for obstacles that they may encounter. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case:</b> Teams that do not engage in effective planning for their collaborations are likely to encounter a range of problems including slackers, domineering teammates, curtailed learning opportunities, and general exclusion from the project work—problems that are often exacerbated on diverse teams and that disproportionately affect marginalized populations. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case:</b> We created three online modules that help students uncover their own tacit expectations for teamwork, share and merge these expectations, and then construct a team charter and task schedules with their teammates. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methods:</b> We used a quasiexperimental design comparing team charters from control and experimental groups to understand how our modules affected students’ charters at a university with a highly international population. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results:</b> Analyses revealed that control group charters tended to invoke universal team norms and assign punishments for failing to uphold those norms. By contrast, experimental group charters were more flexible, acknowledged competing priorities, evidenced greater planning, and articulated processes that could accommodate individual goals, values, and constraints. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions:</b> Charters created after the modules showed more accommodation of difference; however, more research needs to be done to determine whether the more flexible and elaborated charters improve team behaviors.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2023-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3228020
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (37) · 11 in this index

  1. Campbell et al. (2019)
    The Effect of Leader Rapport-Management Feedback on Leader–Member Relationship …
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Lam et al. (2021)
    Follow the Leader? The Impact of Leader Rapport Management on Social Loafing
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Moreau (2020)
    Teams That Innovate: The Language of Difference-Driven Inquiry at the Workplace
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Friess et al. (2021)
    “Dude, that Sucks”: Examining Scrum’s Influence on Empathy in Student Teams
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Feuer (2020)
    Scaffolding Feedback Between Cowriters With Different Levels of English-Languag…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 37 →
  1. Lam (2018)
    More Than a Feeling: Applying a Data-Driven Framework in the Technical and Prof…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Wolfe (2010)
    Team Writing: A Guide to Working in Groups
  3. Lam (2016)
    Improving Technical Communication Group Projects: An Experimental Study of Medi…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. 10.1109/emr.2002.1022419
     ↗
  5. 10.1080/10686967.2009.11918214
     ↗
  6. 10.1037/a0013257
     ↗
  7. 10.1037/gdn0000059
     ↗
  8. 10.1037/apl0000229
     ↗
  9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916343
     ↗
  10. 10.1080/08832323.2010.489588
     ↗
  11. 10.2307/3069453
     ↗
  12. 10.1080/03637751.2013.828155
     ↗
  13. Marcellino (2008)
    Adopting team contracts to initiate team learning
    AASA J. Scholarship Pract.
  14. Jones et al. (2016)
    Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Commun…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. 10.5465/amd.2015.0129
     ↗
  16. 10.1287/mnsc.2017.3001
     ↗
  17. 10.2307/2667029
     ↗
  18. 10.1177/0021886318800997
     ↗
  19. 10.1037/a0034125
     ↗
  20. 10.1080/01411920903191047
     ↗
  21. 10.1177/1088868309359288
     ↗
  22. 10.1177/0021943609340669
     ↗
  23. 10.1080/14675980120087480
     ↗
  24. Varhelahti et al. (2021)
    Diversity and Communication in Virtual Project Teams
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  25. Lam (2015)
    The Role of Communication and Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing in Group Projects
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  26. 10.1080/08832323.2013.763753
     ↗
  27. Conway Hughston (2014)
    Consequences of team charter quality: Teamwork mental model similarity and team viability…
  28. 10.1177/0021886314566075
     ↗
  29. Feuer (2022)
    Collaborative writing across english proficiencies: Using professionals experiences in th…
  30. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020346
     ↗
  31. Saldana (2013)
    The Coding Manual For Qualitative Researchers
  32. Lam (2016)
    Improving Technical Communication Group Projects: An Experimental Study of Medi…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Jun 2024
    Rhetorical Leadership ↗
    Catherine L. Langford
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis feminist rhetorics cultural rhetorics decolonial rhetorics graduate education argument empirical research qualitative research race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
  2. Assessing Writing Oct 2026
    Student-AI collaboration in peer feedback: Effects on perceived feedback quality, emotional responses, and feedback literacy development ↗
    Hua Wang; Kai Guo
    writing pedagogy graduate education collaborative writing assessment empirical research artificial intelligence multilingual writers literacy studies affect and writing
  3. Assessing Writing Oct 2026
    Effects of varying time constraints on quality, linguistic features, and fluency behaviors in L2 writing ↗
    Jongbong Lee; Charlene Polio
    argument assessment empirical research multilingual writers affect and writing
  4. Written Communication Feb 2026
    Rhetoric and Affect: The Role of Faith in Student Writers’ Wayfinding ↗
    Amy D. Williams; Jonathan Ostenson
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis empirical research affect and writing
  5. The Peer Review Sep 2025
    The Writing Center as a Rebel Space: Stories of Tutoring and Writing with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ↗
    Ghada Seifeddine
    discourse analysis teacher development writing centers peer tutoring empirical research multimodality literacy studies race and writing disability studies editorial matter