Abstract

Abstract In numerous communicative practices, particularly in social media communication, it has become common to encounter messages pursuing a multiplicity of possible functions. They provide information, but sharing it is not their only or most important purpose. They appear to advocate for a particular viewpoint, yet no specific conclusion is stated, no argumentative or persuasive context surrounds them, and no dialectical exchanges follow or precede them. From a practical perspective, such messages, designated as “info-arguments,” are powerful strategies for advancing reasons, enabling the speaker to avoid the corresponding burden of proof. From a theoretical perspective, they challenge the pragmatic theories of meaning underlying argument reconstruction. Absent a specific context and considering the composite nature of an audience characterized by diverse backgrounds, how can we establish and justify that an info-argument conveys an argument? This paper proposes an analytical framework based on a dynamic and dialectical approach to meaning. In this view, the meaning of an info-argument is not represented as a pre-existing speaker’s intention manifested in a clear communication setting. Instead, it is regarded as a set of distinct, least defeasible interpretations characterizing various possible scenarios defined by several factors (or presumptions) that vary depending on the interlocutors’ backgrounds and values.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-07-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09667-y
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (78) · 8 in this index

  1. Arundale, Robert. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmat…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  ↗
  2. Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. 2004. Boethius’s De topicis differentiis. Edited by Eleonore Stump. Itha…
  3. Politeness: Some universals in Language usage
     ↗
  4. Perspectives on socially shared cognition
     ↗
  5. Using Language
     ↗
Show all 78 →
  1. Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden. 2013. Self-repair and action construction. In Conversational rep…
     ↗
  2. Elder, Chi-Hé, Michael Haugh. 2023. Exposing and avoiding unwanted inferences in conversational interaction. …
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  3. Elder, Chi-Hé, and Michael Haugh. 2018. The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal acc…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  ↗
  4. Elder, Chi-Hé, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt. 2024. Towards a dynamic functional proposition for dynamic discourse m…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  ↗
  5. Problems in argument analysis and evaluation
  6. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts
  7. Studies in the way of words
  8. Fallacies
  9. Foundations of computational linguistics, human-computer communication in natural Language
     ↗
  10. Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures
     ↗
  11. Ilie, Cornelia. 2022. Meta-questions and meta-answers: The interplay of metadialogic practices in PMQs. Journ…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  12. Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthyme…
     ↗
  13. Argumentation
  14. Argumentation
  15. Jacobs Scott (2016) Employing and exploiting the presumptions of communication in argumentation: An applicati…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  16. Discourse, beliefs and intentions
  17. Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of Language and linguistics
  18. Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2007. The syntax-pragmatics merger: Belief reports in the theory of default semantics. Prag…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  19. Salience and defaults in utterance processing
     ↗
  20. Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2021. Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning? Journal of …
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  21. Semantics, pragmatics, philosophy. A journey through meaning
     ↗
  22. Johnson, Ralph. 1984. Charity Begins at Home. Informal Logic 3:4–9. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v3i3.2791
     ↗
  23. Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40:385–406. https:…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  24. Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive …
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  25. Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42:2889–2897. http…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  26. Intercultural pragmatics
     ↗
  27. Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2013. On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition. …
     ↗
  28. Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure
  29. Lee, James, and Steven Pinker. 2010. Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psy…
     ↗
  30. Principles of pragmatics
  31. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature
     ↗
  32. Lewinski, Marcin. 2021. Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic 41:421–451. https://…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  33. Argumentation
  34. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2018. A dialectical approach to presupposition. Intercultural Pragmatics 15: 291–313. http…
     ↗
  35. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017a. Defaults and inferences in interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 117: 280–290. http…
     ↗
  36. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017b. The logical and pragmatic structure of arguments from analogy. Logique et Analyse 6…
  37. Macagno, Fabrizio. 2022. Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of popul…
     ↗
  38. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Ana Trevisan. 2023. Strategic communication in the Covid-19 pandemics. Uses of argumen…
     ↗
  39. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2017. Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotatio…
     ↗
  40. Argumentation
  41. Argumentation
  42. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi. 2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication– Dialogical i…
     ↗
  43. Pragmatics: An introduction
  44. Nerlich, Brigitte, and David Clarke. 2001. Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal …
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  45. The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion
  46. Oswald, Steve. 2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203:144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016…
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  47. Paglieri, Fabio. 2007. No More Charity, Please! Enthymematic Parsimony and the Pitfall of Benevolence. In Pro…
  48. Perelman, Chaïm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1951. Act and person in argument. Ethics 61:251–269. https://doi…
    Ethics  ↗
  49. Argumentation
  50. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition
     ↗
  51. Reasoning
  52. Relevance: Communication and cognition
  53. Strawson, Peter. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73:439–460. https://…
    The Philosophical Review  ↗
  54. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
     ↗
  55. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective
  56. Argumentation
  57. Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse: Fifty contributions to the d…
     ↗
  58. Argumentation theory: A Pragma-Dialectical perspective
     ↗
  59. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
  60. Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering
     ↗
  61. Van Laar, Jan Albert. 2001. Ambiguity in a dialectical perspective. Informal Logic 21:245–266. https://doi.or…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  62. The dialectic of ambiguity
  63. Informal logic
  64. Slippery slope arguments
     ↗
  65. Argumentation
  66. Fallacies arising from ambiguity
     ↗
  67. The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument
     ↗
  68. One-sided arguments: A dialectical analysis of bias
  69. Fundamentals of critical argumentation
  70. Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric
     ↗
  71. Argumentation schemes
     ↗
  72. Handbook of pragmatics
  73. Better reasoning: Techniques for handling argument, evidence, and abstraction