Writing and Pedagogy Nov 2017

Learner revision practices and perceptions of peer and teacher feedback

Rachael Ruegg Victoria University of Wellington

Abstract

A number of studies have used interviews to find out L2 learners’ perceptions of different feedback practices. Usually, learners who have been interviewed have experienced a number of different feedback practices. The purpose of the present study is to investigate learner revision practices and perceptions of peer and teacher feedback after having received feedback from only one source. In this study, learners received either teacher feedback alone or only peer feedback for one year. Twelve students were then interviewed to investigate their revision practices and perceptions of both peer and teacher feedback. The narrative analysis of the interview data showed that participants were very concerned about ‘correcting’ their drafts. Students in both groups had similar levels of comprehension of feedback; however, those in the peer feedback group were more forthcoming about asking their peers when they did not understand. Students in the teacher feedback group felt that they did not have enough time between drafts for the revisions they wanted to make. It was also found that students in the peer feedback group seemed to benefit more from reading their peers’ writing than from receiving peer feedback.

Journal
Writing and Pedagogy
Published
2017-11-17
DOI
10.1558/wap.33157
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Latif et al. (2024)
    Matches and mismatches between Saudi university students' English writing feedb…
    Assessing Writing

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Assessing Writing Jul 2026
    Examining linguistic reasoning and metalinguistic strategies in L2 writing: Insights from teacher- and AI-feedback revisions ↗
    Huican Huo; Lawrence Jun Zhang
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy advanced composition teacher development revision argument multilingual writers
  2. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    Examining Automated Writing Evaluation Error Coverage in Relation to Uptake and Retention ↗
    Mehrzad, Mohaddeseh; Rahimi, Mohammad; Link, Stephanie
    genre theory writing pedagogy teacher development revision assessment artificial intelligence multilingual writers grammar and mechanics
  3. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    More Than Treating Errors: Bridging the Gaps and Expanding the Agenda for Scholarship on Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Writers ↗
    Goldstein, Lynn; Kohls, Robert
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development revision multilingual writers
  4. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    Feedback Menus: Expanding Student Choice in Response to Writing ↗
    Testa, Andrew
    first-year composition writing pedagogy teacher development revision professional writing literacy studies editorial matter
  5. Computers and Composition Mar 2025
    Playing the digital dialectic game: Writing pedagogy with generative AI ↗
    Rebekah Shultz Colby
    rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy teacher development revision artificial intelligence