JAC: A Journal of Rhetoric, Culture, and Politics

109 articles
Year – Topic Clear
Export Subscribe (Atom)
editorial matter×

2012

  1. Pain, Labor, and Creation: A Response to Don Kraemer [response essay] ↗
  2. The Watson Symposium: What might we be missing . . . and why? [response comic book blog] ↗
  3. Guest Editor Introduction: Economies of Writing ↗
  4. Toward a polyphonic model of student coauthorship: A response to Joseph Harris and Julie Lindquist [response essay] ↗

2011

  1. The spatial turn in rhetorical genre studies: Intersections of metaphor and materiality [response to Dylan B. Dryer] ↗
  2. Rhetorics of e-health and information age medicine: A risk-benefit analysis [response to Karen Kopelson] ↗
  3. Listen to strangers: A response to Dale Jacobs' 'The audacity of hospitality' [response] ↗
  4. Embodying/ disabling plagiarism [response to Amy Robillard] ↗
    Abstract

    This article, written as a response to Amy Robillard's article 'Pass It On: Revising the Plagiarism is Theft Metaphor,' approaches embodiment and plagiarism from a disability studies perspective. Vidali works to illuminate connections between plagiarism and disability such as passing, ownership, and policy. In doing so, she deftly presents the need for scholars, teachers, and administrators to re-think the processes by which these policies are developed and the problematic diagnostics of plagiarism. [Tara Wood, Margaret Price, & Chelsea Johnson, Disability studies, WPA-CompPile Bibliographies, No. 19]

  5. Transformative reframing: From theft to passing on [response to Amy Robillard] ↗
  6. Bobby who? [response to Diane Davis] ↗
  7. Critical theory, critical pedagogy, and the reconceptualization of rhetoric and composition [response to Jeff Pruchnic] ↗
  8. Butler unclarifies the issue [response to Paul Butler] ↗
  9. Revisiting the evidence: A reply to Donald Lazere [reply] ↗
  10. Critical anthropomorphism in the 'Age of biocybernetic reproduction': A response to Nicole Merola's 'Monkeys, Apes, and Bears, oh my!' [response essay] ↗

2010

  1. Feeling the vulgarity of numbers: The Rwandan genocide and the classroom as a site of response to suffering ↗
  2. Hospitality and generosity [response to Dale Jacobs] ↗
  3. From the editor: Thinking with cats (more, to follow) [editorial] ↗

2009

  1. Guest editor's introduction: Rhetoric vexed ↗

2008

  1. No, not really: A reply to Stephen Yarbrough [reader response] ↗
  2. From where I stand: A response to Kristie S. Fleckenstein [reader response] ↗
  3. Listening 'some more': A response to Eve Weiderhold's 'feminist and representational fatigue' [reader response] ↗

2007

  1. Teaching for social justice? Resituating student resistance [response to Mark Bracher] ↗
  2. Promoting social change through higher education [response to Mark Bracher] ↗
  3. Rhetoric and service-learning [response to Mark Bracher] ↗
  4. Enthymematical, epistemic, and emotional silence(s) in the rhetoric of whiteness [response to Matthew Jackson] ↗
  5. In search of the unstated: The enthymeme and/of whiteness [response to Matthew Jackson] ↗
  6. So much depends upon the route [response to James Zebroski] ↗
  7. Being the namer or the named: Working-class discourse conflicts [response to James Zebroski] ↗
  8. Optimistic pessimism: A response to Matthew Jackson ↗
  9. Composition, remember? A response to Halbritter and Taylor's 'Remembering composition' ↗

2006

  1. Class, class consciousness, and 'good teaching jobs': A response to Bill Hendricks [reader response] ↗
  2. History as the path of invention: A response to Jeffrey Williams [reader response] ↗
  3. Reservations: A response to Karen Kopelson ↗
  4. Reprosexuality, queer desire, and critical pedagogy: A response to Hyoejin Yoon [reader response] ↗
  5. Theories of affect and the call for practicality: A response to Jenny Edbauer [reader response] ↗
  6. A chorus of cynics and provisional ethics: A response to Matthew Levy [reader response] ↗
  7. Energies and outbursts: A response to Laura Micciche [reader response] ↗
  8. From identity to emotion: Frameworks for understanding, and teaching against, anticritical sentiments in the classroom [response to Marlie Banning] ↗

2005

  1. Haunting questions: A response to 'Trauma and Rhetoric' [reader response] ↗

2004

  1. Just which 'few people,' anyway? A response to Marc Bousquet [reader response] ↗
  2. The teleology of complexity: A response to Mark C. Taylor [reader response] ↗

2003

  1. Class conflict in composition and rhetoric: Theory-bytes in response to Marc Bousquet and his critics [reader response] ↗

2002

  1. Being reasonable: a response to Richard Marback [reader response] ↗
  2. A pedagogy of listening: A response to Kristie Fleckenstein [reader response] ↗
  3. Principled pedagogy: A reply to Lee-Ann M. Kastman Breuch [reader response] ↗
  4. Reconsidering the human: A response to Stanley Harrison [reader response] ↗
  5. Passing from 'false' to 'true' universality: A reply to Robert Samuels [reader response] ↗
  6. The limits of argument: A response to Sean Williams [reader response] ↗
  7. Behind blue eyes: A response to Marc Bousquet [reader response] ↗
  8. Unpacking assumptions, providing context: A response to Marc Bousquet [reader response] ↗