Assessing Writing

161 articles
Year – Topic Clear
Export Subscribe (Atom)
multilingual writers×

July 2024

  1. Effects of peer feedback in English writing classes on EFL students’ writing feedback literacy ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100874
  2. How syntactic complexity indices predict Chinese L2 writing quality: An analysis of unified dependency syntactically-annotated corpus ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100847
  3. Beyond accuracy gains: Investigating the impact of individual and collaborative feedback processing on L2 writing development ↗
    Abstract

    Despite the burgeoning research on exploring learner engagement with feedback, how second language (L2) learners’ engagement with feedback in different processing conditions influences their subsequent writing development is under-explored. This study examines the effects of individual and collaborative processing (languaging) of teacher feedback on Chinese lower-secondary school EFL learners’ writing development. Eighty-one students aged 13–14 with A1-A2 levels of English proficiency (according to the Common European Framework of Reference) from two classes and two experienced English teachers participated in the study. Students were provided with comprehensive teacher feedback and were asked to process feedback provided on three writing tasks through either individual written or collaborative oral languaging over six weeks. Pre-, post-, and delayed post-tests were administered. Students’ writing development was analysed using complexity, accuracy, and fluency measures, as well as content and organisation writing scores. Findings showed that the two conditions did not influence students’ writing complexity and fluency differently, while only the collaborative oral languaging condition contributed to students’ sustainable accuracy gains. Results based on the analytic writing scores suggested that students in the two conditions significantly improved content and organisation scores over time. Pedagogical and research implications regarding implementing the two feedback processing conditions are discussed.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100876
  4. EFL students' syntactic complexity development in argumentative writing:A latent class growth analysis (LCGA) approach ↗
    Abstract

    The study explored EFL students' development of syntactic complexity by employing the Latent Class Growth Analysis (LCGA) approach. A total of 214 tertiary EFL students from Southwest China were invited to write four argumentative essays over an academic semester. The unconditional models of LCGA were utilized to explore the optimal latent classes of students' development trajectories of syntactic complexity. The conditional models of LCGA were employed to investigate the predictive effect of English proficiency on the optimal latent classes. Results of the unconditional models revealed different latent classes of development trajectories for six indices of syntactic complexity rather than the remaining ones, which offers tentative evidence for the heterogeneity of L2 development trajectories. Results of the conditional models showed that English proficiency did not predict the membership in these latent classes. These results are discussed and implications for L2 instruction are attempted.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100877

April 2024

  1. Establishing analytic score profiles for large-scale L2 writing assessment: The case of the CET-4 writing test ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100826
  2. The associations among growth mindsets, the ideal L2 writing self, and L2 writing enjoyment and their impacts on L2 English writing performance: A gender difference perspective ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100832
  3. Effects of task-based language teaching on functional adequacy in L2 writing ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100838
  4. Exploring the dynamics of student engagement with receiving peer feedback in L2 writing ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100842
  5. Is the variation in syntactic complexity features observed in argumentative essays produced by B1 level EFL learners in Finland and Pakistan attributable exclusively to their L1? ↗
    Abstract

    This study has explored the syntactic complexity features of English learners at the B1 Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) (CoE, 2001) level from both Pakistan and Finland. The learners in question were taught English as a Foreign Language (EFL) using different pedagogical methods. This study took into account various factors including the learners' proficiency level, age, and grade, as well as variations in their native language. To assess the impact of the learners' native language and pedagogical methods on syntactic complexity features, twelfth grade EFL students from Upper-Secondary schools in both nations were given identical instructions and time limits to complete an English academic essay on the same topic. The study utilized L2 syntactic complexity analyzer (L2SCA) to extract fourteen syntactic complexity features, and Mann-Whitney U Tests were used to analyze the differences in the syntactic complexity features between the two groups. The study has revealed significant differences between Finnish and Pakistani EFL learners due to variations in their native language and the effects of pedagogical methods on syntactic complexity features. The implications of this study extend to language testing and assessment, the CEFR framework, and pedagogy in both Finland and Pakistan.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100839
  6. Validity of automated essay scores for elementary-age English language learners: Evidence of bias? ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100815
  7. Assessing video game narratives: Implications for the assessment of multimodal literacy in ESP ↗
    Abstract

    Research into the contribution of multimodality to language learning is gaining momentum. While most studies pave the way for new understandings of language teaching and learning, there is an increasing demand for comprehensive assessment practices, particularly within higher education contexts. A few studies have emphasized the importance of reflecting on and establishing criteria for the assessment of multimodal literacy. This is necessary to understand students’ contributions in detail and to provide them with effective support in developing their multimodal skills. This study discusses the assessment of multimodal writing in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) contexts. It presents the design of an analytical tool for assessing multimodal texts and provided an example of its application. This tool covers assessment categories such as language use, content expression, interpersonal meaning, multimodality, and creativity and originality. As an example, we focus on the multimodal writing of a video game narrative, a genre that requires the integration of multiple modes of communication to convey meaning more effectively. Finally, this study offers pedagogical insights into the assessment of multimodal literacy in ESP.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100809
  8. Is CJ a valid, reliable form of L2 writing assessment when texts are long, homogeneous in proficiency, and feature heterogeneous prompts? ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100843

January 2024

  1. Do I need feedback or avoid it in L2 writing? Impacts of self-efficacy and shyness on feedback-seeking behavior ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100805
  2. Amplifying test-taker voices in the validation of L2 writing assessment tasks ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100790
  3. A mixed Rasch model analysis of multiple profiles in L2 writing ↗
    Abstract

    The present study used the Mixed Rasch Model (MRM) to identify multiple profiles in L2 students’ writing with regard to several linguistic features, including content, organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics. To this end, a pool of 500 essays written by English as a foreign language (EFL) students were rated by four experienced EFL teachers using the Empirically-derived Descriptor-based Diagnostic (EDD) checklist. The ratings were subjected to MRM analysis. Two distinct profiles of L2 writers emerged from the sample analyzed including: (a) Sentence-Oriented and (b) Paragraph-Oriented L2 Writers. Sentence-Oriented L2 Writers tend to focus more on linguistic features, such as grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics, at the sentence level and try to utilize these subskills to generate a written text. However, Paragraph-Oriented Writers are inclined to move beyond the boundaries of a sentence and attend to the structure of a whole paragraph using higher-order features such as content and organization subskills. The two profiles were further examined to capture their unique features. Finally, the theoretical and pedagogical implications of the identification of L2 writing profiles and suggestions for further research are discussed.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100803

October 2023

  1. Student engagement with peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from reflective journaling and revising practices ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100784
  2. Growth mindset and emotions in tandem: Their effects on L2 writing performance based on writers’ proficiency levels ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100785
  3. Feedback literacy in writing research and teaching: Advancing L2 WCF research agendas ↗
    Abstract

    Research on corrective feedback (CF) has developed from its original focus on identifying which type of CF is most effective for developing L2 language learners’ grammatical accuracy to focusing on how learners use CF. Underpinning this is the assumption that learners know what to do with CF when they receive it. The concept of “feedback literacy” challenges this assumption. Carless and Boud (2018), define feedback literacy as “the understandings, capacities and dispositions needed to make sense of information and use it to enhance work or learning strategies” (p. 1316). Our intention in this paper is to reflect on the manner in which theoretical and empirical work on feedback literacy can contribute to advancing L2 written corrective feedback (WCF) research agendas. Central in our proposal is the partially under-researched aspect of experience in terms of the L2 writers’ educational background experience, particularly experience with L1 and L2 writing. We further argue that how learners were taught L1 writing and how the L1 educational culture/ society values writing can impact on how learners approach L2 writing tasks and accompanying feedback. Implications of this inclusive view of the learner for future research and pedagogy is discussed.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100786
  4. Understanding EFL students’ feedback literacy development in academic writing: A longitudinal case study ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100770
  5. Automated analysis of cohesive features in L2 writing: Examining effects of task complexity and task repetition ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100783

July 2023

  1. Diagnosing Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ integrated writing capability: A Log-linear Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (LCDM) study ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100730
  2. Feedback seeking by first-year Chinese international students: Understanding practices and challenges ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100757
  3. The development of teacher feedback literacy in situ: EFL writing teachers’ endeavor to human-computer-AWE integral feedback innovation ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739
  4. Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
  5. Connecting form with function: Model texts for bilingual learners’ narrative writing ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100753
  6. The mediating role of curriculum configuration on teacher’s L2 writing assessment literacy and practices in embedded French writing ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100742
  7. The development and validation of a scale on L2 writing teacher feedback literacy ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100743
  8. Shifting perceptions of socially just writing assessment: Labor-based contract grading and multilingual writing instruction ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100731

April 2023

  1. Your writing could have been better: Examining the effects of upward and downward counterfactual communication on the motivational aspects of L2 writing ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100714
  2. Individual differences in L2 writing feedback-seeking behaviors: The predictive roles of various motivational constructs ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100698
  3. An investigation into L2 writing teacher beliefs and their possible sources ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100710
  4. Exploring multilingual students’ feedback literacy in an asynchronous online writing course ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100718
  5. Genre pedagogy: A writing pedagogy to help L2 writing instructors enact their classroom writing assessment literacy and feedback literacy ↗
    Abstract

    As part of a larger case study, this single exploratory case study aims to explore the potential of genre-based pedagogy (GBP) to allow L2 writing instructors to enact their writing assessment literacy and feedback literacy. The findings demonstrate that GBP afforded the participating writing instructor of a genre-based EAP writing course to carry out effective writing classroom assessment practices and thus enact their2 writing assessment literacy and feedback literacy. GBP allowed effective writing classroom assessment practices such as diagnostic assessment and learner involvement in assessment. More specifically, genre exploration tasks led to diagnostic assessment and helped the instructor coordinate effective classroom discussions to elicit evidence of the students’ knowledge of the target genre that they would study. Second, students’ production of texts in target genres not only allowed the instructor to collect evidence of the students’ specific genre knowledge, but it also afforded learner involvement through self-reflection. The instructor could also efficiently interpret this evidence and provide formative feedback through pre-established genre specific assessment criteria.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100717

January 2023

  1. Exploring the development of student feedback literacy in the second language writing classroom ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100697

October 2022

  1. Transfer of ideal L1 and L2 writing selves and their impacts on L2 writing enjoyment and integrated writing performance ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100674
  2. Structure and coherence as challenges in composition: A study of assessing less proficient EFL writers’ text quality ↗
    Abstract

    Students are usually expected to write full texts in English as a foreign language (EFL) at the end of secondary education. However, research on EFL writing at school is scarce, especially regarding less proficient writers, and seldom focuses on deep-level text features such as structure and coherence. Based on a sample of 166 EFL students in Year 9 attending German middle and lower performance track schools, this study examined 326 narrative and argumentative texts. First, we assessed structure and coherence via analytic ratings using detailed rubrics to gain insights into possible challenges for students. Our analysis showed that relevant text parts (such as the conclusion) were mostly missing and that students struggled to establish a broad common thread with argumentative texts being overall less structured and coherent than narrative texts. Second, we used the software Comproved® to conduct holistic ratings of overall text quality and compared them with our analytic ratings. Large correlations between both ratings suggest that structure and coherence are important aspects of text quality. We discuss how our rubrics can serve as a useful tool for assessment for learning and assist less proficient writers in establishing deep-level features in their texts.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100672
  3. Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
  4. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 writing across proficiency levels: A matter of L1 background? ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100673

July 2022

  1. How feedback conditions broaden or constrain knowledge and perceptions about improvement in L2 writing: A 12-week exploratory study ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100633
  2. Reconceptualizing the impact of feedback in second language writing: A multidimensional perspective ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100630
  3. Explicit strategy-based instruction in L2 writing contexts: A perspective of self-regulated learning and formative assessment ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100645

April 2022

  1. The mediating effects of student beliefs on engagement with written feedback in preparation for high-stakes English writing assessment ↗
    Abstract

    Research in L2 writing contexts has shown developing writers’ beliefs exert a powerful mediating effect on how they respond to written feedback. The mediating role of beliefs is magnified in preparation for high-stakes English writing assessment contexts, where tangible outcomes pivot on successful test performance. The present qualitative case study utilises data from semi-structured interviews to investigate how the beliefs of three self-directed IELTS preparation candidates mediated their affective, behavioural, and cognitive engagement with electronic teacher written feedback across three multi-draft Task 2 rehearsal essays. Utilising a metacognitive conceptual approach (Wenden, 1998), the study identified seven themes: 1) self-concept beliefs regulated engagement, 2) reliance on the expertise of a quality teacher, 3) engagement was mediated by individuals’ learning-to-write beliefs, 4) belief in comprehensive, critical written feedback, 5) feedback deemed transferable was more comprehensively engaged with, 6) entrenched test-taking strategy beliefs hindered engagement, and 7) supplementary self-directed learning activities were considered of limited value. The implications for practitioners of IELTS Writing preparation and the IELTS co-owners are discussed.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100611
  2. Assessing linguistic complexity features in L2 writing: Understanding effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning within the realm of task readiness ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100605

January 2022

  1. Dependency distance measures in assessing L2 writing proficiency ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100603
  2. Incremental Intelligence Matters: How L2 Writing Mindsets Impact Feedback Orientation and Self-Regulated Learning Writing Strategies ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100593
  3. Noun phrasal complexity in ESL written essays under a constructed-response task: Examining proficiency and topic effects ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100595
  4. Linguistic, cultural and substantive patterns in L2 writing: A qualitative illustration of MisLevy’s sociocognitive perspective on assessment ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100574
  5. Appropriateness as an aspect of lexical richness: What do quantitative measures tell us about children's writing? ↗
    Abstract

    Quantitative measures of vocabulary use have added much to our understanding of first and second language writing development. This paper argues for measures of register appropriateness as a useful addition to these tools. Developing an idea proposed by Durrant and Brenchley (2019), it explores what such measures can tell us about vocabulary development in the L1 writing of school children in England and critically examines how results should be interpreted. It shows that significant patterns of discipline- and genre-specific vocabulary development can be identified for measures related to four distinct registers, though the strongest patterns are found for vocabulary associated with fiction and academic writing. Follow-up analyses showed that changes across year groups were primarily driven, not by the nature of individual words, but by the overall quantitative distribution of register-specific vocabulary, suggesting that the traditional distinction between measures of lexical diversity and lexical sophistication may not be helpful for understanding development in this context. Closer analysis of academic vocabulary showed development of distinct vocabularies in Science and English writing in response to sharply differing communicative needs in those disciplines, suggesting that development in children’s academic vocabulary should not be seen as a single coherent process.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100596
  6. Revisiting the predictive power of traditional vs. fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for L2 writing quality: The case of two genres ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100597
  7. The impact of essay organization and overall quality on the holistic scoring of EFL writing: Perspectives from classroom english teachers and national writing raters ↗
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100604