Abstract

Previous studies compare quantitative feedback ratings of student peers and instructors, but new presentation-feedback technologies enable qualitative-feedback comparison. This study extends previous research by comparing qualitative feedback and business professionals’ feedback. Compared to the professionals, the instructors provided similar feedback types and sentiment; students, however, de-emphasized message delivery and made fewer suggestions for improvement. The results suggest that students may need additional practice in critiquing message delivery and in suggesting needed improvements in their peers’ oral presentations. The study also provides a methodology using the new technologies for instructors to calibrate their own and their students’ feedback with professionals’ feedback.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2023-03-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906221120015
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

References (52) · 12 in this index

  1. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing
  2. Writing & speaking for business
  3. 10.1177/1080569904672009
     ↗
  4. Content analysis of communications
  5. 10.1177/108056990106400303
     ↗
Show all 52 →
  1. 10.1080/13691060802151945
     ↗
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. 10.1177/001316446002000104.
     ↗
  6. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.983
     ↗
  7. 10.1177/1469787412441284
     ↗
  8. NACTA Journal
  9. 10.1177/108056999806100306
     ↗
  10. 10.1080/0260293950200305
     ↗
  11. GoReact (n.d.). Feedback. https://help.goreact.com/hc/en-us/articles/360003066092
  12. 10.1177/1080569909356350.
     ↗
  13. 10.1080/09639284.2011.560763
     ↗
  14. 10.3102/003465430298487
     ↗
  15. 10.1177/1049732305276687
     ↗
  16. 10.1177/1080569913493460
     ↗
  17. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching
  18. 10.1177/0021943612474990
     ↗
  19. 10.1177/1080569904268084
     ↗
  20. 10.2307/2529310
     ↗
  21. 10.22682/bcrp.2020.3.1.53
     ↗
  22. 10.19030/ctms.v3i4.5583
     ↗
  23. 10.1080/15358593.2016.1187454
     ↗
  24. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  25. 10.3905/jpe.2003.320037
     ↗
  26. 10.1080/0260293032000066218
     ↗
  27. 10.1023/b:truc.0000021811.66966.1d
     ↗
  28. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  29. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  30. 10.31274/etd-180810-5203
     ↗
  31. 10.4135/9781071802878
     ↗
  32. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  33. 10.1080/02602938.2013.860077
     ↗
  34. PitchVantage (n.d.). Universities. https://pitchvantage.com/how-it-works-universities/
  35. 10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050106
     ↗
  36. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  37. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  38. 10.1177/1080569909349524
     ↗
  39. Written Communication
  40. Journal of the Academy of Business Education
  41. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  42. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  43. The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute
  44. 10.1177/002194368802500204
     ↗
  45. 10.1080/03075079.2015.1117064
     ↗
  46. The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society
  47. Quantitative research methods for communication: A hands-on approach