Abstract

This article examines how Aristotelian rhetorical principles— ethos, pathos, and logos—can help manage social media outrage in complaint handling by translating them into defensive and accommodative response strategies commonly used in service recovery. Two online experiments evaluated four strategies for their effects on complainants’ moods: (a) blame-shifting; (b) promising action; (c) apologizing; and (d) a combination of empathy, apology, and promise. The results showed that accommodative strategies were more effective than defensive ones, with the combination of empathy, apology, and promise as the most effective. The findings suggest incorporating rhetorical training in business communication to enhance response efficacy.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2025-01-26
DOI
10.1177/23294906241308523
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (66) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.1108/QMR-12-2021-0147
     ↗
  2. 10.1080/02650487.2017.1349030
     ↗
  3. 10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211003
     ↗
  4. 10.1080/13683500.2018.1546675
     ↗
  5. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100430
     ↗
Show all 66 →
  1. 10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.007
     ↗
  2. 10.1300/J057v12n03_13
     ↗
  3. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
     ↗
  4. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.04.001
     ↗
  5. Classical rhetoric for the modern student
  6. 10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2
     ↗
  7. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100575
     ↗
  8. 10.1108/JOSM-03-2014-0082
     ↗
  9. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.026
     ↗
  10. 10.1002/mar.20019
     ↗
  11. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012
     ↗
  12. 10.4337/9781802201963.00024
     ↗
  13. 10.23860/diss-garca-ramrez-grisel-2016
     ↗
  14. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.012
     ↗
  15. 10.1108/09596111011066635
     ↗
  16. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.022
     ↗
  17. Thank You for Arguing: What Cicero, Shakespeare and the Simpsons Can Teach Us About the Art of Persuasion
  18. Frontiers of Philosophy in China
  19. 10.1515/ip-2021-2003
     ↗
  20. 10.1108/JCOM-11-2021-0132
     ↗
  21. 10.1016/j.intmar.2020.02.002
     ↗
  22. 10.1007/s11747-019-00661-x
     ↗
  23. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.015
     ↗
  24. 10.1007/978-3-658-10558-7_8
     ↗
  25. 10.5840/beq201323216
     ↗
  26. Argumentation
  27. 10.1007/s12927-011-0004-8
     ↗
  28. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
     ↗
  29. 10.1177/1096348012451455
     ↗
  30. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.009
     ↗
  31. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.050
     ↗
  32. 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.05.008
     ↗
  33. 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104346
     ↗
  34. 10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104739
     ↗
  35. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100463
     ↗
  36. 10.2307/256443
     ↗
  37. 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00056-4
     ↗
  38. 10.11613/BM.2012.031
     ↗
  39. 10.1177/1938965514560014
     ↗
  40. 10.4135/9781529728644
     ↗
  41. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.12.003
     ↗
  42. 10.13189/ujm.2015.031006
     ↗
  43. The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication
  44. RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/
  45. 10.1177/1096348014538052
     ↗
  46. 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.011
     ↗
  47. 10.1108/TR-08-2015-0037
     ↗
  48. 10.1080/15332861.2018.1463793
     ↗
  49. 10.7146/hjlcb.v11i21.25477
     ↗
  50. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100445
     ↗
  51. 10.1177/23294884211032316
     ↗
  52. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100442
     ↗
  53. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.008
     ↗
  54. 10.1057/9781137388551_4
     ↗
  55. 10.5465/amp.2014.0143
     ↗
  56. 10.1177/2329488414525400
     ↗
  57. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.020
     ↗
  58. 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.012
     ↗
  59. 10.1108/JPBM-04-2018-1843
     ↗
  60. 10.1177/0022242919889894
     ↗
  61. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.004
     ↗