Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Oct 2019 Open Access

Why Should I Really Consider This? The Rhetoric of Patient Motives in Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trial Consultations

Richard Marback ; Ellen Barton Wayne State University

Abstract

Phase 1 cancer clinical trial consultations are fraught with ethical and rhetorical issues. Phase 1 trials are designed to test the toxicity, and not the efficacy, of therapeutic agents. Fewer than 5% of patients benefit from their participation in a Phase 1 trial, and over 75% of experimental drugs do not become approved cancer medicines. Bioethicists have long debated the ethics of recruitment consultations for Phase 1 trials solely in terms of the need for patients to make a rational decision based upon enough information to avoid what are called therapeutic misconceptions and/or unrealistic optimism as motivations to participate in Phase 1 trials. We argue here, however, that the ethical challenges in Phase 1 consultations go beyond providing information about the (unknown) risks and (unanticipated) benefits of a Phase 1 clinical trial. In this article, we present a rhetorically oriented case study of a Phase 1 consultation, followed by a rhetorically informed critique of the rationality of bioethics. We use Lauren Berlant’s (2011) concept of “cruel optimism” to develop a more complete account of the rhetorical and ethical nexus of patient motivations in Phase 1 consultations by creating a discursive space to explore the concerns, hopes, and motivations of cancer patients considering participation in the earliest phase of clinical research in cancer medicine. The goal of our study is to propose a framework aimed at achieving Lisa Keränen’s (2007) concept of relational integrity applied to Phase 1 consultations.

Journal
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
Published
2019-10-08
DOI
10.5744/rhm.2019.1012
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Campeau (2023)
    Unofficial Vaccine Advocates: Technical Communication, Localization, and Care b…
    Technical Communication Quarterly

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Computers and Composition Sep 2026
    When writing students design AI chatbots: Integrating design thinking as a critical AI literacy practice ↗
    Jialei Jiang; Gustav Verhulsdonck
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy technical communication qualitative research literacy studies community literacy
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric May 2026
    Standing on a Bridge Between Cultures: Translation and Argumentation ↗
    Christopher W. Tindale; Jiaxing Li
    rhetorical criticism argument qualitative research race and writing
  3. Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026
    Composing in Relation: Rethinking Multimodal Feedback as Rhetorical Design ↗
    Laflen, Angela
    rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory first-year composition writing pedagogy professional writing qualitative research multimodality editorial matter
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly Mar 2025
    Epideictic Listening: From a Reflective Case Study to a Theory of Community Ethos ↗
    Sarah Hart Micke; Angela Sowa; Lisl Davies; Emily Graboski; Maya Piñón
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics argument qualitative research literacy studies
  5. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Mar 2025
    Rehumanizing Rhetoric, Recuperative Ethos, and Human Specimens: A Case Study of the Indiana Medical History Museum ↗
    Kristin LaFollette
    rhetorical criticism argument qualitative research