Abstract
Building on mental health rhetoric research (MHRR), I explore how legal advocates in non-profit organizations guide survivors of domestic abuse in obtaining orders for protection (OFPs). State statutes not only dictate what a petition for an OFP must contain, but these statutes and resulting documents also reflect cultural and structural biases about domestic abuse. Through rhetorical analysis of state statutes and personal interviews with legal advocates in this inductive and qualitative study, I discovered that these advocates engage in subversive rhetorical intervention, what the advocates call “crafty” intervention. Such intervention is designed to meet the requirements of state statutes for an OFP and also provide a way for survivors to tell their stories in their own way. This intervention sets the stage for helping survivors heal from the trauma of domestic abuse, convincing judges that survivors need OFPs to stay safe, and demonstrating to state legislators that domestic abuse statutes may be too restrictive.
- Journal
- Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
- Published
- 2024-05-15
- DOI
- 10.5744/rhm.2024.2004
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Computers and Composition Sep 2026When writing students design AI chatbots: Integrating design thinking as a critical AI literacy practice ↗Jialei Jiang; Gustav Verhulsdonck
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric May 2026Christopher W. Tindale; Jiaxing Li
-
Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026Laflen, Angela
-
Rhetoric Society Quarterly Mar 2025Sarah Hart Micke; Angela Sowa; Lisl Davies; Emily Graboski; Maya Piñón
-
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Mar 2025Rehumanizing Rhetoric, Recuperative Ethos, and Human Specimens: A Case Study of the Indiana Medical History Museum ↗Kristin LaFollette