Abstract

Over the last seven years, I have spent time across three continents talking to scientists and mathematicians about their beliefs and attitudes and experiences related to writing in their respective disciplines.I have been impressed by the passion and insight with which most have talked about writing and its relationship to critical thinking, and I have often been surprised by how they engage in these practices.For example, rather than working from an a priori hypothesis, many researchers in the STEM disciplines compose backwards, from the results to the introduction.And when reading, many seem to move from the middle of a paper outwards, beginning with the results and method, using an extremely critical eye, and then perhaps scanning out to the introduction and the discussion, or dispensing with these sections altogether.Over and over again, I heard this same story from different scientists, as if it were a secret each alone had stumbled upon.In addition, collaboration, conversation and peer review are very much part of the language of composition that takes place in the sciences (co-authorship, the hierarchies of disciplinary or interdisciplinary teams, the drafting process and the use of technology), but we who work in WID (writing in the disciplines) and WAC (writing across the curriculum) programs are constantly challenged: "How do we teach process in ways that are disciplinarily appropriate?"Historically, we haven't done this well.As Burton and Morgan observed on the training of mathematicians as writers,

Journal
Double Helix
Published
2014-01-01
DOI
10.37514/dbh-j.2014.2.1.07
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (26)

  1. Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by Reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73 -84.
     ↗
  2. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writin…
     ↗
  3. David, N., Avril, T., & Caroline, B. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review…
     ↗
  4. Facione, P.A. (2010). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts, 2010 update. Insight Assessment. [Onli…
  5. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Show all 26 →
  1. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Educ…
     ↗
  2. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mat…
  3. Goldin, I. M. (2011). A focus on content: The use of rubric in peer review to guide students and instructors.…
  4. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self-and peer-assessment: the students' views. Higher Educati…
     ↗
  5. Heylings, D. J., & Stefani, L. A. (1997). Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class. …
     ↗
  6. Jones, A. (2007). Multiplicities or manna from heaven? Critical thinking and the disciplinary context. Austra…
     ↗
  7. Jones, E.A., & Ratcliff, G. (1993). Critical thinking skills for college students. University Park, PA: Natio…
  8. Llado, A.P., Soley, L.F., Sansbello, R.M.F., Pujolras, G.A., Planella, J.P., Roura-Pascual, N., Moreno, L.M.…
     ↗
  9. Lin, S., S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with va…
     ↗
  10. Magin, D. J. (2001). A novel technique for comparing the reliability of multiple peer assessments with that o…
     ↗
  11. Miller, P. J. (2003). The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Assessment and …
     ↗
  12. Moore, T. (2004). The critical thinking debate: how general are general thinking skills? Higher Education Res…
     ↗
  13. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer revie…
     ↗
  14. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assess…
     ↗
  15. Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case…
     ↗
  16. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational R…
     ↗
  17. Towns, M. H., Marden, K., Sauder, D., Stout, R., Long, G., Wasman, M.,  Zielinki, T. (2001). Interinstitutio…
  18. Van den berg, I., Admirall, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven …
     ↗
  19. Washburn, K. D. (2010). The architecture of learning: Designing instruction for the learning brain. Pelham, A…
  20. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessm…
     ↗
  21. Venables, A., & Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in E…
     ↗