Abstract

Interactive sea level rise viewers (ISLRVs) are an increasingly popular risk communication technology designed to help users visualize the effects of water inundation on their region so as to facilitate more prudent decision-making. Designed by and for a variety of stakeholders, these viewers generally have as their goal affording users a more "localized" experience with climate change and sea level rise data, allowing users to explore as specific as street-level the effects of rising waters in coastal regions. While the rise of these tools mirrors the trend in risk communication scholarship towards more localized messaging, there is still more work to be done in terms of providing a more localized user experience for a broader public audience. This article presents the results of a user experience study conducted with 12 residents of a coastal region, the results of which formulate an attempt to develop more insight into techniques for designer localization. The article concludes with concrete recommendations for scholars and practitioners concerned with designing more effective interactive risk communication technologies that respond to the public need for localized information for decision-making.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2018-10-01
DOI
10.1145/3282665.3282671
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Communication Design Quarterly

References (32) · 6 in this index

  1. Beck U. (1999). World risk society. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc. Beck U. (1999). World risk society.…
  2. National Hydrology Conference, 52--63
  3. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on geo-information for disaster managemen…
  4. 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.12.015
     ↗
  5. 10.1093/jurban/78.2.382
     ↗
Show all 32 →
  1. The Scientific World Journal, 2014
  2. Dillard A. (1999). For the time being. New York: Knopf. Dillard A. (1999). For the time being. New York: Knopf.
  3. 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[692:DATDTC]2.0.CO;2
     ↗
  4. K. R. Moore & D
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. 10.1145/2556288.2556978
     ↗
  7. 10.1080/17524032.2016.1176946
     ↗
  8. Communication Design Quarterly
  9. 10.1080/13504620220145401
     ↗
  10. 10.3138/carto.48.3.1531
     ↗
  11. 10.3390/ijgi3020408
     ↗
  12. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00402.x
     ↗
  13. Visualizations for data exploration and analysis: A critical review of usability research
    Technical Communication
  14. Mirel B. (2004). Interaction design for complex problem solving: developing useful and usable software. San F…
     ↗
  15. 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
     ↗
  16. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  17. 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745
     ↗
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. 10.1145/2987592.2987626
     ↗
  20. Communication Design Quarterly
  21. Roth F. (2012). Focal report 9: Risk analysis. Visualizing risk: The use of graphical elements in risk analys…
  22. 10.1177/0013916511421196
     ↗
  23. Slovic P. (2010). The more who die the less we care. In P. Slovic (Ed.) The feeling of risk: New perspectives…
  24. Spinuzzi C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cam…
     ↗
  25. 10.1177/1075547014550371
     ↗
  26. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  27. Productive usability: Fostering civic engagement and creating more useful online spaces f…
    Technical Communication Quarterly