Abstract

This article explores rhetorical practices underlying productive deliberation about climate change. We analyze discussion of climate change on a Reddit subforum to demonstrate that good-faith deliberation---which is essential to deliberative democracy---exists online. Four rhetorical concepts describe variation among this subforum's comments: William Keith's distinction between 'discussion' and 'debate,' William Covino's distinction between good and bad magic, Kelly Oliver's notion of ethical response/ability, and Krista Ratcliffe's notion of rhetorical listening. Using a three-part taxonomy based on these concepts, we argue that collaborative climate change deliberation exists and that forum participation guidelines can promote productive styles of engagement.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2019-05-10
DOI
10.1145/3331558.3331561
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 8 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Review

References (77) · 18 in this index

  1. 10.1145/903893.903926
     ↗
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. How to do things with words
     ↗
  4. 10.1086/590649
     ↗
  5. Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of …
     ↗
Show all 77 →
  1. 10.1080/14791420903049736
     ↗
  2. T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, G. M. Weiksner & M
  3. S. P. Walz & S
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. 10.1177/106591290505800203
     ↗
  6. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004
     ↗
  7. A. G. Gross & J
  8. A conceptual definition and conceptual model of public deliberation in small face-to-face…
    Communication Theory
  9. 10.1080/10570310109374708
     ↗
  10. 10.1353/rap.2010.0222
     ↗
  11. 10.1080/17524032.2014.981560
     ↗
  12. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.006
     ↗
  13. Magic, literacy, and the National Enquirer. In. P. Harkin & J
  14. Magic and/as rhetoric: Outline of a history of phantasy
    Journal of Advanced Composition
  15. T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, G. M. Weiksner & M
  16. Feminist digital research methodology for rhetoricians of health and medicine
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  17. Communication Design Quarterly
  18. Ecology and discursive democracy: Beyond liberal capitalism and the administrative state.…
    Socialism
  19. 10.1177/0002764213477097
     ↗
  20. J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, & D
  21. 10.1080/17524032.2014.983536
     ↗
  22. 10.1111/1540-6237.8401005
     ↗
  23. The troubled rhetoric and communication of climate change
     ↗
  24. Communication Design Quarterly
  25. Communication Design Quarterly
  26. Communication Design Quarterly
  27. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.010
     ↗
  28. Technical Communication Quarterly
  29. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton
  30. K. Tracy, J. P. McDaniel, & B
  31. Communication Design Quarterly
  32. Vernacular voices: The rhetorics of publics and public spheres
  33. 10.1353/rap.2002.0029
     ↗
  34. Learning in the wild: Coding for learning and practice on Reddit. Learning Media
    Technology
  35. 10.1177/107769900908600405
     ↗
  36. Climate cover-up: The crusade to deny global warming
  37. Technical Communication Quarterly
  38. 10.1002/wcc.332
     ↗
  39. Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity
     ↗
  40. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
     ↗
  41. 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2005.tb00544.x
     ↗
  42. Cultural cognition and public policy
    Yale Law and Policy Review
  43. Democracy as discussion: Civic education and the American Forum movement
  44. 10.1353/rap.2002.0035
     ↗
  45. Technical Communication Quarterly
  46. This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate
  47. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1029297
     ↗
  48. Communication Design Quarterly
  49. T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, G. M. Weiksner & M
  50. The prospect of Internet democracy.
     ↗
  51. Rebalancing climate change debate and policy: An analysis of online discussions
    Environmental Policy and Governance  ↗
  52. 10.1080/17524032.2014.999694
     ↗
  53. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
     ↗
  54. Engaging the everyday: Environmental social criticism and the resonance dilemma
     ↗
  55. J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, & D
  56. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  57. Witnessing: Beyond recognition
  58. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco…
  59. Communication Design Quarterly
  60. Technical Communication Quarterly
  61. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
     ↗
  62. The climate sceptics
  63. Rhetorical listening: Identification, gender, whiteness
  64. College Composition and Communication
  65. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  66. 10.1002/wcc.191
     ↗
  67. Technical Communication Quarterly
  68. Technical Communication Quarterly
  69. 10.1080/19331681.2011.637711
     ↗
  70. Smoke, mirrors, and hot air: How ExxonMobil uses tobacco's tactics to manufacture uncerta…
  71. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
     ↗
  72. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.008
     ↗