Hybrid collectivity: hacking environmental risk visualization for the anthropocene

Lynda Olman University of Nevada, Reno ; Danielle DeVasto Grand Valley State University

Abstract

In this essay, we propose a hack of existing models of environmental risk communication so that they will better address Anthropocene risks. We focus our discussion on a key area of risk communication: environmental risk visualization (ERV). Drawing on social-constructionist theories of risk and our own research on ERVs, we assemble criteria for designing and evaluating ERVs based on their hybrid collectivity---meaning their ability to collect agents around themselves over time and across traditional Modern divides between human/nonhuman, expert/nonexpert, and nature/culture. We test the criteria on two ERVs from the 2011 Fukushima disaster and discuss the resulting promises and challenges of an approach to risk communication motivated by hybrid collectivity.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.1145/3431932.3431934
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Communication Design Quarterly

References (101) · 19 in this index

  1. 10.1007/s11069-014-1062-2
     ↗
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. SAGE
  4. The process of communication. Holt, Reinhart and Winston
  5. G. Forino, S. Bonati, & L
Show all 101 →
  1. Retrieved
  2. 10.1196/annals.1399.005
     ↗
  3. 10.1177/1075547016677833
     ↗
  4. 10.1353/rap.2010.0222
     ↗
  5. Poroi
  6. Poroi
  7. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
     ↗
  8. 10.1093/jurban/78.2.382
     ↗
  9. Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, December 2--5
  10. 10.1353/clj.2019.0021
     ↗
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. Technical Communication Quarterly
  13. Douthat R. (2020 April 7). In the Fog of Coronavirus There Are No Experts. The New York Times. https://www.ny…
  14. S. Dobrin & S
  15. Poroi
  16. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  17. 10.1057/rm.2009.4
     ↗
  18. Retrieved
  19. 10.1007/BF00146924
     ↗
  20. The archaeology of knowledge
  21. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences
  22. 10.1057/9780230594180
     ↗
  23. 10.1080/00028533.2012.11821771
     ↗
  24. Technical Communication Quarterly
  25. 10.7208/chicago/9780226264196.001.0001
     ↗
  26. Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics
  27. 10.4324/9780429500084
     ↗
  28. 10.4324/9780203873106
     ↗
  29. A. Garry & M
  30. 10.1080/02691728.2011.578301
     ↗
  31. Poroi
  32. Public awareness and public education for disaster risk reduction: A guide.
  33. 10.2307/25472188
     ↗
  34. 10.1177/03063127030333004
     ↗
  35. Can objects be moral agents? Posthuman praxis in public transportation In K. R. Moore & P
  36. Juliana v. United States 217 F. Supp. 3d 1224 (D. Or. 2016) Juliana v. United States 217 F. Supp. 3d 1224 (D.…
  37. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
     ↗
  38. 10.1038/s41893-019-0327-x
     ↗
  39. Technical Communication Quarterly
  40. 10.3138/carto.48.3.1531
     ↗
  41. The environmental justice implications of quantitative risk assessment
  42. 10.1080/09640561003613021
     ↗
  43. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies
  44. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory
     ↗
  45. Love your monsters
    Breakthrough Journal
  46. We have never been modern
  47. An inquiry into modes of existence
  48. 10.1080/14606925.2019.1594963
     ↗
  49. Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks
  50. 10.4245/sponge.v6i1.16075
     ↗
  51. 10.26818/9780814213988
     ↗
  52. 10.5555/2843496
     ↗
  53. 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
     ↗
  54. 10.1071/9780643108387
     ↗
  55. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society
  56. 10.1177/1075547008329201
     ↗
  57. People of the State of New York v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 452044/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct 2020) People of the State of N…
  58. 10.1080/10570310109374689
     ↗
  59. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  60. Technical Communication Quarterly
  61. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  62. 10.1177/107554708600800216
     ↗
  63. The convergence model of communication and network analysis. Communication networks: Towa…
  64. Department of the Environment.
  65. 10.3929/ethz-a-007580138
     ↗
  66. 10.4324/9780203463918
     ↗
  67. 10.1177/0896920520929966
     ↗
  68. 10.3320/978-0-932627-51-3
     ↗
  69. 10.1111/1539-6924.00306
     ↗
  70. 10.14361/transcript.9783839426104
     ↗
  71. 10.1002/geo2.70
     ↗
  72. 10.1559/152304097782476942
     ↗
  73. Leviathan and the air-pump
  74. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.002
     ↗
  75. Technical Communication Quarterly
  76. 10.1080/17524032.2013.850108
     ↗
  77. Communication Design Quarterly
  78. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  79. Visual cultures of science (pp. 266--284)
  80. Discover. Retrieved
  81. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.001
     ↗
  82. C. G. Herndl & S
  83. Technical Communication Quarterly
  84. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199857098.001.0001
     ↗
  85. 10.14361/transcript.9783839426104.81
     ↗
  86. Two-Way: An Alternative to Synoptic Rhetorics of Climate Change
    Works & Days
  87. Written Communication
  88. 10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6
     ↗
  89. 10.1177/1075547014566990
     ↗
  90. Technical Communication Quarterly
  91. H. H. Gerth & C
  92. 10.1111/1467-7717.00176
     ↗
  93. Citizen science in the digital age: Rhetoric, science, and public engagement
  94. 10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004
     ↗
  95. 10.1073/pnas.1112058108
     ↗
  96. 10.1080/23251042.2016.1233605
     ↗