Abstract

Considers how plagiarism continues to elude definition because teachers cannot possibly formulate and act on a definition of plagiarism that articulates both its textual and sexual work. Discusses linking sexual property to textual transgression and rejecting metaphors in relationship to rejecting plagiarism. Suggests educators stop using the term plagiarism altogether and replace it with “fraud,” “insufficient citation,” and “excessive repetition.”

Journal
College English
Published
2000-03-01
DOI
10.58680/ce20001178
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Across the Disciplines
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Across the Disciplines

References (0)

No references on file for this article.