Abstract

Creative writing workshops typically feature a gag rule and emphasize purported flaws. This structure limits students’ meaningful engagement with each other’s work; positions the author as inherently flawed; and positions other participants as authority figures, passing judgment without articulating their aesthetic standards. I propose an alternative structure in which authors lead discussion; the work is treated not as inherently flawed but as “in process”; and discussants articulate their expectations about “good” writing rather than allowing them to function as unspoken norms.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-06-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20097197
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. College English
  2. Writing and Pedagogy
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Pedagogy
Show all 6 →
  1. Pedagogy

References (0)

No references on file for this article.