Argumentation Flaws in Institutional Handling of an Allegation of Research Misconduct

Sylvain Tollis Biologie Computationnelle, Quantitative et Synthétique ; Marie Maze Biologie Computationnelle, Quantitative et Synthétique ; Erja Moore
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09723-1
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (91) · 5 in this index

  1. Act 1347/1991. Asetus tutkimuseettisestä toimikunnasta/Act on the national advisory board on research ethics.…
  2. Act 621/1999. Act on the Openness of Government Activities. Retrieved January 6, 2026, from https://www.finle…
  3. All European Academies. 2023. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. (ALLEA code). Retrieved Ja…
  4. Association of Finnish Foundations. 2015. Säätiön hyvä hallinto/ Good governance of a foundation. Retrieved J…
  5. Balan, A. 2023. Neoliberalism, privatisation and marketisation: The implications for legal education in Engla…
    Cogent Education  ↗
Show all 91 →
  1. Ball, S. 2012. The making of a neoliberal academic. Research in Secondary Teacher Education 2 (1): 29–31.
    Research in Secondary Teacher Education
  2. Beime, K. S., H. Englund, and J. Gerdin. 2021. Giving the invisible hand a helping hand: How ‘grants offices’…
    British Educational Research Journal  ↗
  3. The book of fallacies: From unfinished papers of Jeremy Bentham by a friend
     ↗
  4. Bornmann, L., and W. Marx. 2015. Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliomet…
    Journal of Informetrics  ↗
  5. Bouter, L. 2024. Research misconduct and questionable research practices form a continuum. Accountability in …
    Accountability in Research  ↗
  6. Bouter, L. M., J. Tijdink, N. Axelsen, et al. 2016. Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results fr…
    Research Integrity and Peer Review  ↗
  7. Brooker, R., and N. Allum. 2024. Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific …
    Research Integrity and Peer Review  ↗
  8. Campbell, T. D. 1970. The normative fallacy. The Philosophical Quarterly 20 (81): 368–377.
    The Philosophical Quarterly  ↗
  9. Defending qualitative research: Design, analysis, and textualization
  10. Confucius. 1979. The Analects (translated by Lau, D. C.) Original ca. 5th century BCE. Penguin Books.
  11. Johnson, D. K. 2018. Suppressed Evidence. In Arp, R., Barbone, S. & Bruce, M. (eds.) Bad arguments: 100 of th…
     ↗
  12. Daraio, C., and A. Vaccari. 2022. How should evaluation be? Is a good evaluation of research also just? Towar…
    Scientometrics  ↗
  13. de Rijcke, S., P. Wouters, A. Rushforth, T. Franssen, and B. Hammarfelt. 2015. Evaluation practices and effec…
    Research Evaluation  ↗
  14. Desmond, H., and K. Dierickx. 2021. Research integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergen…
    Bioethics  ↗
  15. Fanelli, D. 2010. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data…
    PLoS ONE  ↗
  16. Fanelli, D., A. Voodla, S. Andres et al. 2026 Questionable research practices: A principled classification an…
     ↗
  17. Fang, F. C., and A. Casadevall. 2011. Retracted science and the retraction index. Infection and Immunity 79 (…
    Infection and Immunity  ↗
  18. Farsani, M. A., and A. M. Riazi. 2025. Exploring questionable research practices in applied linguistics mixed…
    Journal of Second Language Studies  ↗
  19. Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making
  20. Freijedo-Farinas, F., A. Ruano-Ravina, M. Pérez-Ríos, J. Ross, and C. Candal-Pedreira. 2024. Biomedical retra…
    Scientometrics  ↗
  21. Gasser, R. B. 2024. Neoliberalism in academia: reflections from a parasitologist. Parasites & Vectors 17:487.
    Parasites & Vectors  ↗
  22. Gill, R. 2014. Academics, cultural workers and critical labour studies. Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (1): 12–30.
    Journal of Cultural Economy  ↗
  23. Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections
  24. Golden, J., C. M. Mazzotta, and K. Zittel-Barr. 2023. Systemic obstacles to addressing research misconduct in…
    Journal of Academic Ethics  ↗
  25. Gopalakrishna, G., G. Ter Riet, G. Vink, I. Stoop, J. M. Wicherts, and L. M. Bouter. 2022. Prevalence of ques…
    PLoS ONE  ↗
  26. Grey, A., M. Bolland, and G. Gamble. 2019. Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by acad…
    Research Integrity and Peer Review  ↗
  27. Gunsalus, C. K., A. R. Marcus, and I. Oransky. 2018. Institutional research misconduct reports need more cred…
    JAMA  ↗
  28. Hämäläinen, W. 2007. TENK:in ohjeet tekijyysongelmista. (TENK’s instructions regarding authorship issues.) TE…
  29. Habermas, J. 1976/1998. What is Universal Pragmatics? In On the Pragmatics of Communication, 21–104. Cambridg…
  30. The alienated academic: The struggle for autonomy inside the university
     ↗
  31. Haven, T., and R. van Woudenberg. 2021. Explanations of research misconduct, and how they hang together. Jour…
    Journal of General Philosophy of Science  ↗
  32. Helmer, S., D. B. Blumenthal, and K. Paschen. 2020. What is meaningful research and how should we measure it?…
    Scientometrics  ↗
  33. Hicks, D., P. F. Wouters, I. Rafols, S. De Rijcke, and L. Waltman. 2015. The Leiden Manifesto for research me…
    Nature  ↗
  34. IEP. 2025. Fallacies. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. A peer-reviewed academic resource. Retrieved Decem…
  35. Ioannidis, J. P. A., and Z. Maniadis. 2023. In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments. PLo…
    PLoS Biology  ↗
  36. Ioannidis, J. P. A., and Z. Maniadis. 2024. Quantitative research assessment: Using metrics against gamed met…
    International Emergency Medicine  ↗
  37. Isbell, D. R., D. Brown, M. Chen, D. J. Derrick, R. Ghanem, M. N. G. Arvizu, E. Schnur, M. Zhang, and L. Plon…
    The Modern Language Journal  ↗
  38. Kaiser, M., L. Drivdal, J. Hjellbrekke, H. Ingierd, and O. B. Rekdal. 2021. Questionable research practices a…
    Science and Engineering Ethics  ↗
  39. Kallo, J., and J. Välimaa. 2025. Higher education in Nordic countries: Analyzing the construction of policy f…
    Higher Education  ↗
  40. Kivistö, J., E. Pekkola. 2017. Quality of Administration in Higher Education. Sveriges universitets- och högs…
  41. Laudel, G. 2006. The art of getting funded: How scientists adapt to their conditions. Science and Public Poli…
    Science and Public Policy  ↗
  42. Lepori, B., P. van den Besselaar, M. Dinges, B. van der Meulen, B. Poti, E. Reale, S. Slipersaeter, and J. Th…
    Research Evaluation  ↗
  43. Lewis, B. R., J. E. Duchac, and S. D. Beets. 2011. An academic publisher’s response to plagiarism. Journal of…
    Journal of Business Ethics  ↗
  44. Argumentation
  45. Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435:737–738.
    Nature  ↗
  46. Mountz, A., A. Bonds, B. Mansfield, J. Loyd, J. Hyndman, M. Walton-Roberts, M. et al. (2015) For slow scholar…
  47. Moore, E. 2020. Inconsistent responses to notifications of suspected plagiarism in Finnish higher education. …
    Journal of Academic Ethics  ↗
  48. Müller, R., and S. de Rijcke. 2017. Thinking with indicators: Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic per…
    Research Evaluation  ↗
  49. Muukkonen, M. 2023. Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö (HTK) – käsitteellisiä täsmennyksiä. (Good scientific practice…
    Tiedepolitiikka
  50. Nouchi, R., H. Aihara, F. Arie, M. Asashima, H. Daida, J. Fudano, Y. Fujiwara, S. Fushiki, R. J. Geller, K. H…
    Accountability in Research  ↗
  51. Pantazi, M., M. Kissine, and O. Klein. 2018. The power of the truth bias: False information affects memory an…
    Social Cognition  ↗
  52. Parliamentary Ombudsman of Finland. 2019. Ammattikorkeakoulu menetteli asiakirjapyynnön käsittelyssä lainvast…
  53. Paulus, F. M., N. Cruz, and S. Krach. 2018. The Impact Factor Fallacy. Frontiers in Psychology 9:1487.
    Frontiers in Psychology  ↗
  54. Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: Un…
  55. Plonsky, L., D. Brown, M. Chen, R. Ghanem, M. N. Gutiérrez Arvizu, D. R. Isbell, and M. Zhang. 2024b. ‘Signif…
    Research Methods in Applied Linguistics  ↗
  56. Ethical issues in applied linguistics scholarship
     ↗
  57. Popa, E. 2024. Convincing in pragma-dialectics: A critical reassessment. Topoi 43:1295–1307.
    Topoi  ↗
  58. Argumentation
  59. Räsänen, L., and E. Moore. 2016. Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Resea…
     ↗
  60. Resnik, D. B. 2021. Standards of evidence for institutional review board decision-making. Accountability in R…
    Accountability in Research  ↗
  61. Resnik, D. B., L. M. Rasmussen, and G. E. Kissling. 2015. An international study of research misconduct polic…
    Accountability in Research  ↗
  62. Roy, S., and M. A. Edwards. 2023. NSF fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scienti…
    Scientific Reports  ↗
  63. Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education
     ↗
  64. Roulet, T. J., and R. Pichler. 2020. Blame game theory: scapegoating, whistleblowing and discursive struggles…
     ↗
  65. TENK. 2023a. The Finnish code of conduct for research integrity and procedures for handling alleged violation…
  66. TENK. 2023b. Tutkimusetiikkaa koronan aikaan: Tutkimusetiikan barometri 2023. (Research ethics at the time of…
  67. TENK. 2023c. Revisions to English Translation of Finnish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. 5.12.2023. R…
  68. TENK. 2024a. Tutkimuseettisen neuvottelukunnan lausunto (TENK 2024-14). Statement by Finnish National Board o…
  69. TENK. 2024b. Annual report of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. Retrieved May 28, 2026, …
  70. Tijdink, J. K., G. Valkenburg, S. de Rijcke, and G. Dix. 2024. Relational responsibilities: Researchers’ pers…
    PLoS ONE  ↗
  71. The new law: Suggestions for reforms and improvements of existing legal norms and principles
     ↗
  72. The uses of argument
  73. Argumentation
  74. Argumentation
  75. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective
  76. van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser. 1999. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Stud…
    Discourse Studies  ↗
  77. Handbook of argumentation theory 7. Pragmatics and discourse analysis
     ↗
  78. Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contempora…
  79. Argumentation
  80. van Eijbergen, R., and V. M. Siebers. 2023. Understanding whistleblowing in practice: Experiences in the Neth…
    Public Integrity  ↗
  81. Vendé, B., A. Barberousse, S. Ruphy. 2025. From 2015 to 2023, eight years of empirical research on research i…
     ↗
  82. Vignolo, M. 2013. What incompleteness arguments are and what they are not. Ratio 27 (2): 123–139.
    Ratio  ↗
  83. Informal logic: A handbook for critical argument
  84. Woods, J., and D. Walton. 1974. Argumentum ad verecundiam. Philosophy & Rhetoric 7 (3): 135–153.
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  85. Xie, Y., K. Wang, and Y. Kong. 2021. Prevalence of research misconduct and questionable research practices: A…
    Science and Engineering Ethics  ↗
  86. Case study research: Design and methods