Abstract

While internationalization has become a buzzword in composition scholarship and teaching, our discourses tend toward fuzzy uses and understandings of the term and its multiple implications. We tend to focus on how our U.S. experience is being internationalized: how English and its teaching are spreading; how other countries, different in their approaches or rhetorics, appear to lack what we have; and how we might avoid colonialist intervention or offer consultation. These import/export focal points create key blind spots in our awareness of deep and rich writing research and programming traditions internationally, of how we fit—or do not fit—into this broader world, and of missed opportunities for self-reflection and growth.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-12-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20099470
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (21)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. College English
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 21 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Across the Disciplines
  5. Across the Disciplines
  6. Literacy in Composition Studies
  7. Literacy in Composition Studies
  8. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  9. Rhetoric Review
  10. Pedagogy
  11. Literacy in Composition Studies
  12. Literacy in Composition Studies
  13. Written Communication
  14. Across the Disciplines
  15. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  16. Across the Disciplines

References (0)

No references on file for this article.