Abstract

This essay argues that students must call on their rhetorical sensibilities each time they sit down to write instead of automatically assuming that engaging in code-meshing is the appropriate response to every writing situation. It also encourages pedagogical efforts among teachers that invite students to locate translingualism in its larger contextual relationship with monolingualism and multlingualism, two other approaches to language difference that inform the teaching of writing. In the end, the essay suggests, students must take into consideration how each of these approaches to language difference influences the various decisions they are required to make in the writing classroom.

Journal
College English
Published
2016-01-01
DOI
10.58680/ce201627653
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (26)

  1. Literacy in Composition Studies
  2. Literacy in Composition Studies
  3. Literacy in Composition Studies
  4. Literacy in Composition Studies
  5. Literacy in Composition Studies
Show all 26 →
  1. Literacy in Composition Studies
  2. Literacy in Composition Studies
  3. Literacy in Composition Studies
  4. Literacy in Composition Studies
  5. Literacy in Composition Studies
  6. Literacy in Composition Studies
  7. Literacy in Composition Studies
  8. Literacy in Composition Studies
  9. Literacy in Composition Studies
  10. Research in the Teaching of English
  11. Across the Disciplines
  12. Open Words: Access and English Studies
  13. College Composition and Communication
  14. Written Communication
  15. Pedagogy
  16. Literacy in Composition Studies
  17. Literacy in Composition Studies
  18. Across the Disciplines
  19. Across the Disciplines
  20. Across the Disciplines
  21. Across the Disciplines

References (0)

No references on file for this article.