Abstract

Using a multiple case-study approach, this study investigated the dynamics of peer interactions that took place through Microsoft Copilot among six pairs ( n  = 12) of ESL learners, focusing on their interaction patterns, use of semiotic and multimodal resources, and functions of languaging. Our analyses illustrated that four pairs displayed collaborative orientation, one pair demonstrated an expert-novice pattern, and one pair exhibited a dominant-passive pattern. It was also found that while the collaborative group students focused more on text search and revision, the expert-novice group and the dominant-passive group allocated more time to image generation. Furthermore, in terms of languaging functions, our results revealed that all six pairs of students spent most of their time negotiating writing content. Our study has implications for technology-enhanced multimodal writing pedagogy in a generative artificial intelligence machine-in-the-loop setting.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-08-12
DOI
10.1177/07410883261461544
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (72) · 7 in this index

  1. Akoto M. Li M. (2025). Exploring collaborative digital multimodal composition: Interaction patterns and texts…
     ↗
  2. Alzubi A. A. F. Nazim M. Alyami N. (2025). Do AI-generative tools kill or nurture creativity in EFL teaching …
     ↗
  3. Baek C. Tate T. Warschauer M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and percepti…
     ↗
  4. Betker J. Goh G. Jing L. Brooks T. Wang J. Li L. Ouyang L. Zhuang J. Lee J. Guo Y. Manassra W. Dhariwal P. Ch…
  5. Chen W. (2021). Understanding students’ motivation in L2 collaborative writing. ELT Journal 75(4) 442–450. ht…
     ↗
Show all 72 →
  1. Chen W. Hapgood S. (2021). Understanding knowledge participation and learning in L2 collaborative writing: A …
     ↗
  2. Cheung A. (2022). Verbal and on-screen peer interactions of EFL learners during multimodal collaborative writ…
     ↗
  3. Cheung A. (2025). Influence of semiotic resources on peer interactions during collaborative digital multimoda…
     ↗
  4. Cheung K. K. C. Oancea A. Erduran S. (2025). Students’ meaning-making of nature of science: Interaction betwe…
     ↗
  5. Cheung L. Crosthwaite P. (2025). CorpusChat: Integrating corpus linguistics and generative AI for academic wr…
     ↗
  6. Chu H. C. Lu Y. C. Tu Y. F. (2025). How GenAI-supported multi-modal presentations benefit students with diffe…
  7. Ci F. Jiang L. (2025). The integration of generative artificial intelligence into digital multimodal composin…
     ↗
  8. Creely E. (2024). Exploring the role of generative AI in enhancing language learning: Opportunities and chall…
     ↗
  9. Daniel S. Pacheco M. Smith B. Burriss S. Hundley M. (2023). Cultivating writerly virtues: Critical human elem…
     ↗
  10. Darmawansah D. Rachman D. Febiyani F. Hwang G. J. (2025). ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Inte…
     ↗
  11. Das T. K. Mohapatro A. (2025). Text summarization: An application of generative AI. In Vajjhala N. R. Roy S. …
     ↗
  12. Gasaymeh A. M. M. Beirat M. A. Abu Qbeita A. A. A. (2024). University students’ insights of generative artifi…
     ↗
  13. Hayes J. R. Olinghouse N. G. (2015). Can cognitive writing models inform the design of the common core state …
     ↗
  14. Hsu L. M. Field R. (2003). Interrater agreement measures: Comments on Kappan Cohen’s Kappa Scott’s π and Aick…
     ↗
  15. Computers and Composition
  16. Jiang L. Lai C. (2025). How did the generative artificial intelligence-assisted digital multimodal composing …
     ↗
  17. Jiang S. Smith B. E. Shen J. (2021). Examining how different modes mediate adolescents’ interactions during t…
     ↗
  18. Kang J. Yi Y. (2023). Beyond ChatGPT: Multimodal GenAI for L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 62 …
     ↗
  19. Khaliliaqdam S. (2014). ZPD scaffolding and basic speech development in EFL context. Procedia–Social and Beha…
     ↗
  20. Written Communication
  21. Lee D. Kim S. Y. (2022). A comparison of input- and output-based planning on the oral performance of low prof…
     ↗
  22. Journal of Writing Research
  23. Li C. Yang L. (2022). How scientific concept develops: Languaging in collaborative writing tasks. System 105 …
     ↗
  24. Li D. Xia S. Guo K. (2025a). Investigating L2 learners’ text-to-video resemiotisation in AI-enhanced digital …
     ↗
  25. Li D. Xia S. Guo K. (2025b). Using AI to enhance digital multimodal composing: EFL learners’ semiotic decisio…
     ↗
  26. Li M. Zhu W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer …
     ↗
  27. Computers and Composition
  28. Liu M. Zhang L. J. Biebricher C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assiste…
     ↗
  29. Liu M. Zhang L. J. Zhang D. (2025). Enhancing student GAI literacy in digital multimodal composing through de…
     ↗
  30. Maxwell J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16(6) 475–482. https://doi.o…
     ↗
  31. Mayo M. D. P. G. Agirre A. I. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of in…
     ↗
  32. Meng X. Tong Z. (2025). Multimodal retrieval-augmented generation framework for visually rich knowledge in th…
     ↗
  33. Michel M. Bazhutkina I. Abel N. Strobl C. (2025). Collaborative writing based on generative AI models: Revisi…
     ↗
  34. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook
  35. Mizumoto A. (2023). Data-driven learning meets generative AI: Introducing the framework of metacognitive reso…
     ↗
  36. Moore J. (2024). Kairotic entanglement: Kairos artificial intelligence persuasion and the search for meaning—…
     ↗
  37. 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
     ↗
  38. Ong J. Zhang L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ …
     ↗
  39. Ong J. Zhang L. J. (2013). Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes on EFL writers’ text quality. T…
     ↗
  40. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-40 technical report (arXiv:2303.08774). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
  41. Peterson M. (2012). EFL learner collaborative interaction in Second Life. ReCALL 24(1) 20–39. https://doi.org…
     ↗
  42. Two frameworks to guide discussions around levels of acceptable use of generative AI in s…
    Journal of Academic Language and Learning
  43. Roy K. Khandelwal V. Vera V. Surana H. Heckman H. Sheth A. (2024). GEAR-Up: GenAI and external knowledge-base…
     ↗
  44. Singh N. Bernal G. Savchenko D. Glassman E. L. (2023). Where to hide a stolen elephant: Leaps in creative wri…
     ↗
  45. Smith B. E. Pacheco M. B. de Almeida C. R. (2017). Multimodal codemeshing: Bilingual adolescents’ processes c…
     ↗
  46. Storch N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52(1) 119–158. https://doi.org/…
     ↗
  47. 10.21832/9781847699954
     ↗
  48. Basics of qualitative research
  49. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
  50. Computers and Composition
  51. Computers and Composition
  52. Vartiainen H. Liukkonen P. Tedre M. (2025). Emerging human-technology relationships in a co-design process wi…
     ↗
  53. Computers and Composition
  54. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes
  55. Wang D. (2024). Digital multimodal composing as a translanguaging space: Understanding students’ initial expe…
     ↗
  56. Wang L. (2022). Effects of regulation on interaction pattern in web-based collaborative writing activity. Com…
     ↗
  57. Wang T. Wu T. Liu H. Brown C. Chen Y. (2025). Generative co-learners: Enhancing cognitive and social presence…
     ↗
  58. Wu W. Wang H. Li B. Huang P. Zhao X. Liang L. (2025 August 5). MultiRAG: A knowledge-guided framework for mit…
     ↗
  59. Wu X. Huang S. Wang G. Xiong J. Wei F. (2024). Multimodal large language models make text-to-image generative…
     ↗
  60. Wu X. Tran T. T. M. Zhou Q. Sun J. Wu H. Wang X. (2026). Human-AI co-creation or conflict? Mapping art studen…
     ↗
  61. Xie X. Teng M. F. Zhang L. J. Alamer A. (2025). Exploring AI literacy and AI-induced emotions among Chinese u…
     ↗
  62. Xu T. S. Zhang L. J. Gaffney J. S. (2022). Examining the relative effectiveness of task complexity and cognit…
     ↗
  63. Zhan Y. Yan Z. (2025). Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: Implications for student feedback literacy…
     ↗
  64. Zhang L. J. (2010). Negotiating language literacy and identity: A sociocultural perspective on children’s lea…
     ↗
  65. Scaling in-the-wild training for diffusion-based illumination harmonization and editing b…
  66. Uni-ControlNet: All-in-one control to text-to-image diffusion models
    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  67. Zhou Y. Yu S. Liu B. Jiang L. (2024). Examining the role of writing proficiency in students’ feedback literac…
     ↗