Argumentation Aug 2026 Open Access

Invitational Rhetoric and Persuasion Rhetoric: Aligning Argumentative Influence with Epistemic Agency

Matthew McKeon Michigan State University

Abstract

Abstract This paper advances a unified account of how argumentative influence can align with epistemic agency by reframing the distinction between invitational and persuasion rhetoric. Drawing on Foss and Griffin’s (1995) influential articulation of invitational rhetoric as grounded in equality, immanent value, and self-determination, I argue that invitational communication inherently positions addressees as reason receivers —agents capable of understanding, evaluating, and endorsing reasons through their own rational capacities. In such settings, perspective change, when it occurs, constitutes rational self-persuasion , an internal process grounded in the addressee’s judgment of the speaker’s reasons. Foss and Griffin contrast this with persuasion rhetoric, holding that persuasion aims to modify others’ attitudes and thereby risks producing compliance under influence through pressure amplified by unbracketed power differentials. I contend, however, that this criticism targets only a subset of persuasion: persuasion that is purely uptake-driven. Building on insights from Gearhart (1979), Tindale (1999), and contemporary persuasion theory (e.g., O’Keefe 2016), I defend the rational persuasion thesis, according to which a speaker’s intention to rationally persuade is the intention to have addressees persuade themselves by judging the speaker’s premises to be reasons they themselves have. When persuasion is so understood, the speaker’s intention is inherently aligned with epistemic agency and motivates the creation of rhetorical environments marked by safety, value, and freedom—conditions Foss and Griffin take to be distinctive of invitational rhetoric. I conclude that argumentation respects epistemic agency not by forgoing influence, but by aiming at rational self-persuasion, thereby distinguishing rational from merely causal forms of rhetorical efficacy.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-08-11
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09724-0
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (35) · 4 in this index

  1. E Aronson (1999)
    Aronson, E. 1999. The Power of Self-Persuasion. American Psychologist 54(11):875–884.
    American Psychologist  ↗
  2. Blair (2012)
    Argumentation as Rational Persuasion
    Argumentation
  3. P Boghossian (2014)
    Boghossian, P. 2014. What Is Inference? Philosophical Studies 169:1–18.
    What Is Inference? Philosophical Studies  ↗
  4. Bondy (2024)
    Can Rational Persuasion Be Epistemically Paternalistic?
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. JE Bone (2008)
    Bone, J. E., C. L. Griffin, and T. M. Linda Scholz. 2008. Beyond Traditional Conceptualizations of Rhetoric: …
    Western Journal of Communication  ↗
Show all 35 →
  1. AW Burks (1970)
    Burks, A. W. 1970. Persuasion, Self-Persuasion and Rhetorical Discourse. Philosophy & Rhetoric 3(2):109–119.
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Casey (2024)
    Argument’s Autonomy Problem
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. LJ Cohen (1992)
    An Essay on Belief and Acceptance
  4. JN Druckman (2021)
    Druckman, J. N. 2021. A Framework for the Study of Persuasion. The Annual Review of Political Science 25(2):1–24.
    The Annual Review of Political Science
  5. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2022. Argument and Argumentation, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Editio…
  6. CZ Elgin (2013)
    Elgin, C. Z. 2013. Epistemic Agency. Theory and Research in Education 11(2):135–152.
    Theory and Research in Education  ↗
  7. Elgin, C. Z. 2017. True Enough. MIT Press.
     ↗
  8. CZ Elgin (2022)
    Epistemic Autonomy
  9. SK Foss (2019)
    Inviting Transformation: Presentational Speaking for a Changing World
  10. SK Foss (1995)
    Foss, S. K., and C. L. Griffin. 1995. Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communicati…
    Communication Monographs  ↗
  11. SK Foss (2019)
    Foss, S. K., and C. L. Griffin. 2019. Integrity in Rhetoric: A Taxonomy of Possibilities. Intraspection 2:16–30.
    Intraspection
  12. SK Foss (2020)
    Inviting Understanding: A Portrait of Invitational Rhetoric
     ↗
  13. SK Foss (2024)
    Foss, S. K., and H. A. Shugart. 2024. Invitational Rhetoric as a Feminist Challenge to the Rhetorical Traditi…
    Argumentation et Analyse du Discours  ↗
  14. SK Foss (2020)
    Inviting Understanding: A Portrait of Invitational Rhetoric
     ↗
  15. R Fulkerson (1996)
    Fulkerson, R. 1996. Transcending our conception of argument in light of feminist critiques. Argumentation and…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  16. SM Gearhart (1979)
    Gearhart, S. M. 1979. The Womanization of Rhetoric. Woman Studies International Quarterly 2:195–201.
    Woman Studies International Quarterly  ↗
  17. D Godden (2020)
    Epistemic Paternalism: Conceptions, Justifications, and Implications
  18. J Goodwin (2019)
    Goodwin, J., and B. Innocenti. 2019. The pragmatic force of making an argument. Topoi 38(4):669–680.
    Topoi  ↗
  19. GR Maio (2007)
    Maio, G. R., and R. Thomas. 2007. The Epistemic–Teleologic Model of Deliberate Self-Persuasion. Personality a…
    Personality and Social Psychology Review  ↗
  20. I Mallin (2000)
    Mallin, I., and C. V. Anderson. 2000. Inviting Constructive Argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 36(3):120–133.
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  21. R McKenna (2025)
    McKenna, R. 2025. The Ethics and Epistemology of Persuasion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 54(4):314–328.
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  22. MW McKeon (2024)
    Arguments and Reason-Giving
     ↗
  23. McKeon (2026)
    Argument, Changing Minds, and Persuasion
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  24. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2017. The Enigma of Reason. Harvard University Press.
     ↗
  25. S Mitchell (2024)
    Mitchell, S., and T. Douglas. 2024. Wrongful rational persuasion online. Philosophy & Technology 37(35):1–25.
    Philosophy & Technology
  26. R Nozick (1981)
    Philosophical Explanations
  27. DJ O’Keefe (2016)
    Persuasion: Theory and Research
     ↗
  28. P Schwardmann (2022)
    Schwardmann, P., Egon Tripodi, and J. van der Joël. 2022. Self-Persuasion: Evidence from Field Experiments at…
    American Economic Review  ↗
  29. CW Tindale (1999)
    Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical model of Argument
  30. G Tsai (2014)
    Tsai, G. 2014. Rational persuasion as paternalism. Philosophy & Public Affairs 42(1):78–112.
    Philosophy & Public Affairs  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Jun 2024
    Rhetorical Leadership ↗
    Catherine L. Langford
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis feminist rhetorics cultural rhetorics decolonial rhetorics graduate education argument empirical research qualitative research race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
  2. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2023
    Remembering Women Differently: Refiguring Rhetorical Work ↗
    Carly S. Woods
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory feminist rhetorics teacher development argument archival research qualitative research digital rhetoric multimodality race and writing gender and writing
  3. Rhetorica Mar 2022
    Lives, Letters, and Quilts: Women and Everyday Rhetorics of Resistance by Vanessa Kraemer Sohan ↗
    Sarah Walden
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism genre theory feminist rhetorics argument translingualism literacy studies gender and writing community literacy book reviews
  4. Rhetorica Mar 2019
    Antebellum American Women’s Poetry: A Rhetoric of Sentiment by Wendy Dasler Johnson ↗
    Paige V. Banaji
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis feminist rhetorics argument archival research literacy studies gender and writing disability studies literary studies
  5. Rhetorica Jun 2017
    Women’s Irony: Rewriting Feminist Rhetorical Histories by Tarez Samra Graban ↗
    Tiffany Kinney
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis feminist rhetorics argument archival research gender and writing public rhetoric