Pedagogy Apr 2026

Defining Critical AI Literacy in the Context of Corporate Narratives

Michael L. Black ; Ann C. Dean

Abstract

Abstract Scholars, policymakers, and educators have proposed definitions of AI literacy that differ in their details but share an assumption that students will inevitably use GenAI throughout their lives, opting out only occasionally. In this article, the authors discuss a hands-on AI literacy activity performed with pen and paper and designed using an opt-in approach to GenAI. Working with 113 students in multiple sections of required first-year-composition at a public university, the authors piloted the activity and administered a validated survey to assess student attitudes toward GenAI before and after. While the survey showed little change in students’ attitudes, it did reveal the range of perceptions students have toward GenAI and how it impacts their agency as writers, learners, and young professionals. As the authors show, students often reproduce the narratives found in corporate marketing and documentation, drawing on them to navigate long-standing cultural and structural problems within higher education, particularly endemic transactional views of writing. The authors conclude that AI literacy training must foreground human activity awareness, focusing on human attention, choices, perceptions, and thoughts.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-12278158
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (37) · 1 in this index

  1. Altman, Sam . 2024. “The Intelligence Age,” 23 September. https://ia.samaltman.com/.
  2. Anthropic. n.d. “AI Fluency—Delegation.” https://www.anthropic.com/ai-fluency/ai-fluency-delegation (accessed…
  3. Anthropic. 2024. “Claude's Character,” 8 June. https://www.anthropic.com/research/claude-character.
  4. Asimov (1956)
    The Last Question
  5. Belanger (2024)
    Air Canada Must Honor Refund Policy Invented by Airline's Chatbot
    Ars Technica
Show all 37 →
  1. Brandt (2001)
    Literacy in American Lives
     ↗
  2. Brandt (2015)
    The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy
  3. Carillo (2022)
    MLA Guide to Digital Literacy
     ↗
  4. Cooper (2011)
    Rhetorical Agency as Emergent and Enacted
    College Composition and Communication
  5. Cousineau, Cater . 2024. “Responsible AI implementation starts with human-in-the-loop oversight.” T…
  6. Daly, Charles . 2025. “Klarna Slows AI-Driven Job Cuts with Call for Real People.” Bloomberg. https…
  7. Google. n.d. “Google Agentspace.” Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/products/agentspace (accessed 9 July…
  8. Google. 2025. “Just Ask Google.” YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386Cw1vKOfI (accessed 10July2025).
  9. Hoftstadter (1996)
    The Ineradicable Eliza Effect and Its Dangers
  10. Howard (1992)
    A Plagiarism Pentimento
    Journal of Teaching Writing
  11. Jamieson (2013)
    Sentence-Mining: Uncovering the Amount of Reading and Reading Comprehension in College Wr…
  12. Kirschenbaum (2024)
    AI and the University as a Service
    PMLA
  13. Knight (2024)
    OpenAI's GPT-4o Model Gives ChatGPT a Snappy, Flirty Upgrade
    Wired
  14. Laquintano (2023)
    Introduction to Teaching with Text Generation Technologies
  15. Manarin (2016)
    Critical Reading in Higher Education: Academic Goals and Social Engagement
  16. Messeri (2024)
    Artificial Intelligence and Illusions of Understanding in Scientific Research
    Nature  ↗
  17. Metz (2024)
    Google Retires A.I. Chatbot Bard and Releases Gemini, a Powerful New App
    New York Times
  18. Microsoft. 2025. “2025: The Year the Frontier Firm is born,” 23April. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab…
  19. MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. 2024a. “Working Paper 3: Building a Culture for Generative AI Li…
  20. MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI. 2024b. “Working Paper 2: Generative AI and Policy Development: G…
  21. Morris (2025)
    Anthropic CEO Warns AI Could Eliminate Half of All Entry-Level White-Collar Jobs
    Fortune
  22. Ng (2021)
    Conceptualizing AI literacy: An Exploratory Review
    Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
  23. OpenAI. n.d. “Guide to Building Custom GPTs.” https://sites.google.com/openai.com/education-hub/home/students…
  24. OpenAI. 2025a. “Introducing Deep Research,” 2 February. https://openai.com/index/introducing-deep-research/.
  25. OpenAI. 2025b. “Introducing Operator,” 23January. https://openai.com/index/introducing-operator/.
  26. Saldaña (2009)
    The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
  27. Schepman (2020)
    Initial Validation of the General Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
    Computers in Human Behavior Reports  ↗
  28. Selfe (2004)
    Literate Lives in the Information Age: Narratives of Literacy from the United States
     ↗
  29. Shah (2022)
    Situating search
  30. Tufecki (2025)
    The Dangerous A.I. Nonsense That Trump and Biden Fell For
    New York Times
  31. Weizenbaum (1976)
    Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation
  32. Yang (2025)
    US Lawyer Sanctioned After Being Caught Using ChatGPT for Court Brief
    Guardian
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related articles

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Sep 2026
    Gender Differences in Nonverbals of Business Undergraduates: Self-Assessment Insights of Perceived Credibility ↗
    Daisy Tan
    assessment professional writing literacy studies gender and writing
  2. Assessing Writing Jul 2026
    GPTZero and the challenges of AI detection in assessing writing ↗
    Louie Giray; Kershnee Sevnarayan; Kgabo Bridget Maphoto
    assessment artificial intelligence multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing editorial matter
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jun 2026
    Résumé Redesign: An Experiential Assignment Using AI Applicant Tracking Systems ↗
    Rachel Dolechek; Karen McCullough
    assessment professional writing online writing instruction literacy studies
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Developing students’ feedback literacy in disciplinary academic writing through generative artificial intelligence ↗
    Jianda Liu; Zihao Shi; Wanqing Li
    artificial intelligence literacy studies
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2026
    Surveys as UXR: Using Design Thinking to Shape a Survey-Based UX Assessment for Rural Audiences ↗
    Kaitlin J. Coyle; Derek G. Ross
    assessment technical communication qualitative research literacy studies