Philosophy & Rhetoric
Jun 2020
Phronesis and the Scientific, Ideological, Fearful Appeal of Lockdown Policy
Celeste M. Condit
University of Georgia
Abstract
ABSTRACT “Lockdown!” has articulated our collective and individual fear response to the novel coronavirus. Two regnant specialized discourses fostered by the academy—science and ideology critique—could not redirect this inadequate response nor generate their own adequately broad and focused social responses. This suggests the desirability of the academy adding phronesis as a goal for its pedagogical practices.
- Journal
- Philosophy & Rhetoric
- Published
- 2020-06-15
- DOI
- 10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0254
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
-
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related articles
-
Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026Laflen, Angela
-
Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026Testa, Andrew
-
Pedagogy Oct 2025Emily Rónay Johnston
-
Pedagogy Oct 2025modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy advanced composition creative writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development technical communication professional writing labor and working conditions archival research multimodality artificial intelligence literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies literary studies editorial matter
-
The Peer Review Sep 2025Moving Against the Grain: Combining Writing Center Theory and In-House Editing Services to Create a Graduate Writing Center ↗Brian Harrell; Brook Wyers; Craig Theissen