Opening a Performance Dialogue With Employees: Facework, Voice, and Silence

Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman North Dakota State University ; Sandi W. Smith Michigan State University

Abstract

This study examines how a supervisor’s delivery of negative feedback affects employees’ tendency to respond by either voicing their ideas or remaining silent. The results show that approbation, or the use of praise to soften face threat, was the most effective facework message for the supervisor to use when providing negative feedback. When employees felt more threatened, they reported that they would be less likely to use voice to help others and more likely to use silence defensively as a response, but as their perceptions of threat decreased, they generally reported that they were more likely to use voice to help others. The article discusses implications of these results, limitations of the study, and future directions of this research.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2015-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651915588147
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (63) · 3 in this index

  1. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01728.x
     ↗
  2. 10.1037/h0055756
     ↗
  3. 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.199
     ↗
  4. 10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.235
     ↗
  5. Acquisitions of skill
Show all 63 →
  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     ↗
  2. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1978.tb02130.x
     ↗
  3. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.912
     ↗
  4. 10.1080/00909880009365572
     ↗
  5. 10.1037/a0019130
     ↗
  6. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  7. 10.1177/0265407502019004047
     ↗
  8. 10.4135/9781483326986
     ↗
  9. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
     ↗
  10. 10.1080/10510974.2013.811431
     ↗
  11. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00954.x
     ↗
  12. Studies in social power
  13. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.453
     ↗
  14. 10.1080/10510979309368395
     ↗
  15. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1961.tb00344.x
     ↗
  16. 10.1177/0893318908327159
     ↗
  17. 10.1177/014920639301900203
     ↗
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3<309::AID-JOB895>3.0.CO;2-P
     ↗
  19. Written Communication
  20. Exit, voice, and loyalty
  21. 10.1177/089124191020001003
     ↗
  22. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01618.x
     ↗
  23. 10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349
     ↗
  24. Fear of feedback
    Harvard Business Review
  25. The interactive effects of positive affect and a sense of competency on the politics perc…
    Journal of Management
  26. 10.1080/03634520109379252
     ↗
  27. 10.1006/obhd.1994.1084
     ↗
  28. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00318.x
     ↗
  29. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x
     ↗
  30. 10.1177/105065198700100106
     ↗
  31. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  32. 10.4324/9781410608871
     ↗
  33. 10.1023/A:1018823126219
     ↗
  34. The technical editor as diplomat: Linguistic strategies for balancing clarity and politeness
    Technical Communication
  35. 10.1016/0090-2616(75)90029-7
     ↗
  36. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<235::AID-JOB9>3.0.CO;2-N
     ↗
  37. 10.1002/job.754
     ↗
  38. 10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.211
     ↗
  39. 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.211
     ↗
  40. 10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20007-3
     ↗
  41. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  42. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1966.tb00013.x
     ↗
  43. 10.2307/256461
     ↗
  44. 10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.428
     ↗
  45. 10.1177/002194369503200401
     ↗
  46. 10.1108/02683940410520637
     ↗
  47. 10.1287/isre.10.2.150
     ↗
  48. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105.x
     ↗
  49. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01248.x
     ↗
  50. 10.1177/1059601102238358
     ↗
  51. 10.2307/255641
     ↗
  52. 10.1111/1467-6486.00384
     ↗
  53. 10.2307/256902
     ↗
  54. 10.1177/0013164493053003023
     ↗
  55. 10.1080/10417949909373134
     ↗
  56. 10.1037/a0015848
     ↗
  57. 10.1080/10510974.2010.514674
     ↗
  58. 10.1177/0261927X00019002002
     ↗