At Last: “Analyses” and “Interpretations”: Are They Complementary?

Courtney B. Cazden

doi:10.58680/rte20042947

Research in the Teaching of English Feb 2004

At Last: “Analyses” and “Interpretations”: Are They Complementary?

Courtney B. Cazden

Abstract

In 1986, while still at Harvard, I started teaching summer school at the Bread Loaf School of English, the graduate program in English of Middlebury College. Bread Loaf offers courses in literature, theater, and writing—where I fit in. I came to that job with a background in applied linguistics and cognitive development, but not in literature, and so started out feeling professionally marginal. But appropriation of interests and understandings from repeated participation in a powerful environment has its effects, and I’m now increasingly intrigued by differences in perspectives on texts between language research and the humanities. This is my first attempt to consider them together.

Journal: Research in the Teaching of English
Published: 2004-02-01
DOI: 10.58680/rte20042947
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: teacher development
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

At Last: “Analyses” and “Interpretations”: Are They Complementary?

Abstract

Citation context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (0)

Related articles