Subjectivity, Intentionality, and Manufactured Moves: Teachers’ Perceptions of Voice in the Evaluation of Secondary Students’ Writing

Jill V. Jeffery

doi:10.58680/rte201117151

Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2011

Subjectivity, Intentionality, and Manufactured Moves: Teachers’ Perceptions of Voice in the Evaluation of Secondary Students’ Writing

Jill V. Jeffery

Abstract

Composition theorists concerned with students’ academic writing ability have long questioned the application of voice as a standard for writing competence, and second language compositionists have suggested that English language learners may be disadvantaged by the practice of emphasizing voice in the evaluation of student writing. Despite these criticisms, however, voice continues to frequently appear as a goal in guidelines for teaching writing and on high-stakes writing assessment rubrics in the United States. Given the apparent lack of alignment between theory and practice regarding its use, more empirical research is needed to understand how teachers apply voice as a criterion in the evaluation of student writing. Researchers have used sociocultural and functionalist frameworks to analyze voice-related discursive patterns, yet we do not know how readers evaluate written texts for voice. To address this gap in research the present study asked: 1) What language features do secondary English teachers associate with voice in secondary students’ writing and how do they explain their associations? 2) How do such identified features vary across genres as well as among readers? Nineteen teachers were interviewed using a think-aloud protocol designed to illuminate their perceptions of voice in narrative and expository samples of secondary students’ writing. Results from an inductive analysis of interview transcripts suggest that participating teachers associated voice with appraisal features, such as amplified expressions of affect and judgment, that are characteristic of literary genres.

Journal: Research in the Teaching of English
Published: 2011-08-01
DOI: 10.58680/rte201117151
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: genre theory writing pedagogy teacher development assessment empirical research qualitative research multilingual writers affect and writing
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation context

Cited by in this index (2)

O’Hallaron et al. (2016)

“Voice” in children’s science arguments: Aligning assessment criteria with genr…

Assessing Writing
Vincelette et al. (2013)

Show and tell: Student and instructor perceptions of screencast assessment

Assessing Writing

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Subjectivity, Intentionality, and Manufactured Moves: Teachers’ Perceptions of Voice in the Evaluation of Secondary Students’ Writing

Abstract

Citation context

Cited by in this index (2)

References (0)

Related articles